These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12871000)

  • 1. Ferric sulphate and formocresol pulpotomies in baboon primary molars: histological responses.
    Cleaton-Jones P; Duggal M; Parak M; William S; Setze S
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2002 Sep; 3(3):121-5. PubMed ID: 12871000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Equivalency study of histological responses to complete or partial pulpotomies in inflamed baboon immature first permanent molars.
    Cleaton-Jones P; Duggal M; Parak R; Williams S; Setzer S
    SADJ; 2007 Mar; 62(2):062-5. PubMed ID: 17624175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Zinc oxide-eugenol and calcium hydroxide pulpectomies in baboon primary molars: histological responses.
    Cleaton-Jones P; Duggal M; Parak R; Williams S; Setzer S
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2004 Sep; 5(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 15471519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pulpitis induction in baboon primary teeth using carious dentine or Streptococcus mutans.
    Cleaton-Jones P; Duggal M; Parak R; Williams S; Setzer S
    SADJ; 2004 Apr; 59(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 15214216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pulp response to ferric sulfate, diluted formocresol and IRM in pulpotomized primary baboon teeth.
    Fuks AB; Eidelman E; Cleaton-Jones P; Michaeli Y
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 9328676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpotomies in primary molars with formocresol, glutaraldehyde and ferric sulphate.
    Havale R; Anegundi RT; Indushekar K; Sudha P
    Oral Health Dent Manag; 2013 Mar; 12(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 23474578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ferric sulphate and formocresol in pulpotomy of primary molars: long term follow-up study.
    Ibricevic H; Al-Jame Q
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Mar; 4(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 12870985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth.
    Smaïl-Faugeron V; Courson F; Durieux P; Muller-Bolla M; Glenny AM; Fron Chabouis H
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Aug; (8):CD003220. PubMed ID: 25099759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of three pulpotomy medicaments in primary teeth.
    Markovic D; Zivojinovic V; Vucetic M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Sep; 6(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 16216093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of formocresol versus ferric sulphate primary molar pulpotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Peng L; Ye L; Guo X; Tan H; Zhou X; Wang C; Li R
    Int Endod J; 2007 Oct; 40(10):751-7. PubMed ID: 17714467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current concepts in vital primary pulp therapy.
    Fuks AB
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2002 Sep; 3(3):115-20. PubMed ID: 12870999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence-based assessment: evaluation of the formocresol versus ferric sulfate primary molar pulpotomy.
    Loh A; O'Hoy P; Tran X; Charles R; Hughes A; Kubo K; Messer LB
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(5):401-9. PubMed ID: 15460294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Formocresol and ferric sulfate have similar success rates in primary molar pulpotomy. In carious primary molars does a pulpotomy performed with ferric sulphate, compared with formocresol, result in greater clinical/radiographic success?
    Deery C
    Evid Based Dent; 2005; 6(3):70. PubMed ID: 16184159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effectiveness of mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium hydroxide and formocresol for pulpotomies in primary teeth.
    Moretti AB; Sakai VT; Oliveira TM; Fornetti AP; Santos CF; Machado MA; Abdo RC
    Int Endod J; 2008 Jul; 41(7):547-55. PubMed ID: 18479381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp medicaments for pulpotomies in primary molars.
    Noorollahian H
    Br Dent J; 2008 Jun; 204(11):E20. PubMed ID: 18425074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcome of formocresol/ZOE sub-base pulpotomies utilizing alternative radiographic success criteria.
    Strange DM; Seale NS; Nunn ME; Strange M
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 11572492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calcium phosphate cement as an alternative for formocresol in primary teeth pulpotomies.
    Jose B; Ratnakumari N; Mohanty M; Varma HK; Komath M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(4):522. PubMed ID: 24047854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp-capping agents in pulpotomized primary teeth.
    Agamy HA; Bakry NS; Mounir MM; Avery DR
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(4):302-9. PubMed ID: 15344622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence of pulpotomy in primary teeth comparing MTA, calcium hydroxide, ferric sulphate, and electrosurgery with formocresol.
    Stringhini Junior E; Vitcel ME; Oliveira LB
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2015 Aug; 16(4):303-12. PubMed ID: 25833280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. No clear evidence of superiority regarding pulp medicaments in primary molars.
    Elkhadem A; Sami I
    Evid Based Dent; 2014 Dec; 15(4):100-1. PubMed ID: 25522937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.