These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12871000)

  • 41. Caries control and other variables associated with success of primary molar vital pulp therapy.
    Vij R; Coll JA; Shelton P; Farooq NS
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 15185801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Histological comparison of pulpal inflammation in primary teeth with occlusal or proximal caries.
    Kassa D; Day P; High A; Duggal M
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2009 Jan; 19(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 19120507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Pulpal tissue reaction to formocresol vs. ferric sulfate in pulpotomized rat teeth.
    Cotes O; Boj JR; Canalda C; Carreras M
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 9484135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Radiographic assessment of primary molar pulpotomies restored with resin-based materials.
    Guelmann M; McIlwain MF; Primosch RE
    Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 15839391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Vital pulp therapy with new materials for primary teeth: new directions and treatment perspectives.
    Fuks AB
    J Endod; 2008 Jul; 34(7 Suppl):S18-24. PubMed ID: 18565366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Vital pulp therapy with new materials for primary teeth: new directions and Treatment perspectives.
    Fuks AB
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(3):211-9. PubMed ID: 18615986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A comparison of the pulpal response to freeze-dried bone, calcium hydroxide, and zinc oxide-eugenol in primary teeth in two cynomolgus monkeys.
    Fadavi S; Anderson AW
    Pediatr Dent; 1996; 18(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 8668571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic evaluation of Nd:YAG laser pulpotomy on human primary teeth.
    Odabaş ME; Bodur H; Bariş E; Demir C
    J Endod; 2007 Apr; 33(4):415-21. PubMed ID: 17368330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Microleakage of restorative techniques for pulpotomized primary molars.
    Guelmann M; Bookmyer KL; Villalta P; García-Godoy F
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2004; 71(3):209-11. PubMed ID: 15871455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Clinical and radiographic success rates of mineral trioxide aggregate and ferric sulphate pulpotomies performed by dental students.
    Odabaş ME; Alaçam A; Sillelioğlu H; Deveci C
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2012 Jun; 13(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 22762173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effects of Nd:YAG laser pulpotomy on human primary molars.
    Liu JF
    J Endod; 2006 May; 32(5):404-7. PubMed ID: 16631836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Formocresol, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Portland Cement, and Enamel Matrix Derivative in Primary Teeth Pulpotomies: A Two Year Follow-Up.
    Yildirim C; Basak F; Akgun OM; Polat GG; Altun C
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 26696101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A clinical study of ferric sulfate as a pulpotomy agent in primary teeth.
    Fei AL; Udin RD; Johnson R
    Pediatr Dent; 1991; 13(6):327-32. PubMed ID: 1843987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Alternative method of hemorrhage control in full strength formocresol pulpotomy.
    Thompson KS; Seale NS; Nunn ME; Huff G
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 11447951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Ca(OH)2 pulpotomy in primary teeth. Part I: internal resorption as a complication following pulpotomy.
    Sönmez D; Durutürk L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Aug; 106(2):e94-8. PubMed ID: 18554946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Sodium Hypochlorite Versus Formocresol and Ferric Sulfate Pulpotomies in Primary Molars: 18-month Follow-up.
    Farsi DJ; El-Khodary HM; Farsi NM; El Ashiry EA; Yagmoor MA; Alzain SM
    Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 26883612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Treatment outcomes of pulpotomy in primary molars using two endodontic biomaterials. A 2-year randomised clinical trial.
    Malekafzali B; Shekarchi F; Asgary S
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2011 Sep; 12(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 22077689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effectiveness of 4 pulpotomy techniques--randomized controlled trial.
    Huth KC; Paschos E; Hajek-Al-Khatar N; Hollweck R; Crispin A; Hickel R; Folwaczny M
    J Dent Res; 2005 Dec; 84(12):1144-8. PubMed ID: 16304444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Sodium hypochlorite versus Formocresol in primary molars pulpotomies: a randomized clinical trial.
    Al-Mutairi MA; Bawazir OA
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Mar; 14(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 23597217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Histopathological Evaluation of Dental Pulp of Primary Teeth Pulpotomized with Formocresol with/without a Capping Agent: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Oliadarani FK; Haghgoo R; Mashhadiabbas F; Kahvand M
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2018; 8(5):420-423. PubMed ID: 30430069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.