222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12872305)
21. A permutation test sensitive to differences in areas for comparing ROC curves from a paired design.
Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2873-93. PubMed ID: 16134144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Semi-parametric ROC regression analysis with placement values.
Cai T
Biostatistics; 2004 Jan; 5(1):45-60. PubMed ID: 14744827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The partial area under the summary ROC curve.
Walter SD
Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The agreement chart as an alternative to the receiver-operating characteristic curve for diagnostic tests.
Bangdiwala SI; Haedo AS; Natal ML; Villaveces A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):866-74. PubMed ID: 18687288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Combining diagnostic test results to increase accuracy.
Pepe MS; Thompson ML
Biostatistics; 2000 Jun; 1(2):123-40. PubMed ID: 12933515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Smooth semiparametric receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Wan S; Zhang B
Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(12):2565-86. PubMed ID: 17072821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Evaluation of diagnostic tests performance: the ROC curve].
Van Meerhaeghe A
Rev Med Brux; 2002 Apr; 23(2):92-5. PubMed ID: 12056064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An ROC-type measure of diagnostic accuracy when the gold standard is continuous-scale.
Obuchowski NA
Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):481-93. PubMed ID: 16287217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Association between transferrin receptor-ferritin index and conventional measures of iron responsiveness in hemodialysis patients.
Chen YC; Hung SC; Tarng DC
Am J Kidney Dis; 2006 Jun; 47(6):1036-44. PubMed ID: 16731299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of correlated receiver operating characteristic curves derived from repeated diagnostic test data.
Zou KH
Acad Radiol; 2001 Mar; 8(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 11249086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Variability of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves in the diagnostic evaluation of liver fibrosis markers: impact of biopsy length and fragmentation.
Poynard T; Halfon P; Castera L; Charlotte F; Le Bail B; Munteanu M; Messous D; Ratziu V; Benhamou Y; Bourlière M; De Ledinghen V;
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2007 Mar; 25(6):733-9. PubMed ID: 17311607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Model checking for ROC regression analysis.
Cai T; Zheng Y
Biometrics; 2007 Mar; 63(1):152-63. PubMed ID: 17447940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The use of the 'binormal' model for parametric ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests.
Hanley JA
Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(14):1575-85. PubMed ID: 8855483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Advantages to transforming the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve into likelihood ratio co-ordinates.
Johnson NP
Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2257-66. PubMed ID: 15236429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Semiparametric estimation of time-dependent ROC curves for longitudinal marker data.
Zheng Y; Heagerty PJ
Biostatistics; 2004 Oct; 5(4):615-32. PubMed ID: 15475423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. New nonparametric confidence intervals for the Youden index.
Zhou H; Qin G
J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(6):1244-57. PubMed ID: 23075020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Confidence intervals for the generalized ROC criterion.
Reiser B; Faraggi D
Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):644-52. PubMed ID: 9235120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of non-parametric confidence intervals for the area under the ROC curve of a continuous-scale diagnostic test.
Gengsheng Qin ; Hotilovac L
Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Apr; 17(2):207-21. PubMed ID: 18426855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The optimal ratio of cases to controls for estimating the classification accuracy of a biomarker.
Janes H; Pepe M
Biostatistics; 2006 Jul; 7(3):456-68. PubMed ID: 16428259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
