136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12872476)
21. [Changed attitude of the Medico-legal Council to ureteral injuries related to hysterectomy].
Osler M
Ugeskr Laeger; 1992 May; 154(19):1365-8. PubMed ID: 1598714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Legal issues for nurses. Navigating the Board of Nurse Examiner's disciplinary process.
Becker PA
Tex Nurs; 1996; 70(6):13-4. PubMed ID: 8932254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Litigation and legislation. You can't say that.
Jerrold L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):248-9. PubMed ID: 22284294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Expert group is to examine the effect and value of the NHS constitution.
Limb M
BMJ; 2012 Mar; 344():e1798. PubMed ID: 22411923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Expert testimony: a perspective from the trenches.
Hawkins TS
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Feb; 2(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 17411781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [The law of medical responsibility. New stakes].
Hureau J; de Fontbressin P
Bull Acad Natl Med; 2003; 187(1):161-73. PubMed ID: 14556462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Finance issue brief: Consumer grievance procedures: internal and independent appeals: year end report-2003.
MacEachern L
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2003 Dec; ():1-43. PubMed ID: 14969268
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Legal responsibilities of anesthesia-resuscitation specialists for professional malpractice].
Starchenko AA; Furkaliuk MIu; Komarets SA; Prilukova TI
Anesteziol Reanimatol; 2003; (3):3-10. PubMed ID: 12918191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A right to be heard.
Sibbald B
Can Nurse; 1997 Nov; 93(10):22-30. PubMed ID: 9444143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [The right to inspect the records in medical insurance expert testimony. The judgement of the Frankfurt Higher Regional Court of 28 May 1991].
Rieger HJ
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1992 Jun; 117(23):919-21. PubMed ID: 1597121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Trial and error. Medical courts, arbitration systems are among the ideas gaining attention as answers to the malpractice liability crisis.
Romano M
Mod Healthc; 2003 Sep; 33(36):26-9. PubMed ID: 14520833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Double suffering for the patient when treatment fails].
Kent A
Lakartidningen; 2008 Mar 18-Apr 1; 105(12-13):926-7; discussion 927. PubMed ID: 18461866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [May the family physician be informed about unapproved inpatient treatment?].
Lemke R
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2005 Jun; 130(24):1519. PubMed ID: 15942845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Expert advice in liability cases].
Brands WG
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2009 May; 116(5):228-33. PubMed ID: 19507415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. When peer review is not enough.
Miller C
Birth Gaz; 1997; 13(4):12-6. PubMed ID: 9348796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Legal aspects of medical expert testimony and non-economic damage in civil liability of physician].
Pauković H
Lijec Vjesn; 2008; 130(11-12):288-93. PubMed ID: 19146186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Nursing competence--exemplified by expert assessment of decubitus ulcer prevention].
Jacobs P
Krankenpfl J; 2003; 41(4-6):78-83. PubMed ID: 12929311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Finance issue brief: insurer liability: year end report-2003.
MacEachern L
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2003 Dec; ():1-19. PubMed ID: 14964230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. High/low agreement.
Dodds PR
Conn Med; 2007 Sep; 71(8):500. PubMed ID: 17902391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Is hospital peer review evidence admissible?
J Med Pract Manage; 2000; 15(5):221. PubMed ID: 10915510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
