These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12872748)

  • 1. [Vibration analysis of maxillary removable partial denture using three types of major connectors].
    Matsumoto N
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Jun; 70(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 12872748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vibration analysis of maxillary removable partial denture frameworks.
    Inoue T; Oki M; Phankosol P; Ohyama T; Taniguchi H
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Apr; 29(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 11966967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rigidity of three different types of mandibular major connector through vibratory observations.
    Arksornnukit M; Taniguchi H; Ohyama T
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):510-6. PubMed ID: 12066696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of deformation by stereophotogrammetry of various kinds of major connectors in maxillary Kennedy Class I removable partial dentures.
    Ozkan P; Aydin AK
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 11842909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acceptability of maxillary major connectors in removable partial dentures.
    Arigbede AO; Dosumu OO; Esan TA; Akeredolu PA
    Afr Health Sci; 2006 Jun; 6(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 16916303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Finite element analysis of deflections in major connectors for maxillary RPDs.
    Eto M; Wakabayashi N; Ohyama T
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 12375456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rigidity of major connectors when subjected to bending and torsion forces.
    Ben-Ur Z; Matalon S; Aviv I; Cardash HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Nov; 62(5):557-62. PubMed ID: 2691659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of design modifications on the torsional and compressive rigidity of U-shaped palatal major connectors.
    Green LK; Hondrum SO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):400-7. PubMed ID: 12690354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of direct retainer and major connector designs on RPD and abutment tooth movement dynamics.
    Itoh H; Baba K; Aridome K; Okada D; Tokuda A; Nishiyama A; Miura H; Igarashi Y
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 35(11):810-5. PubMed ID: 18482346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stiffness of different designs and cross-sections of maxillary and mandibular major connectors of removable partial dentures.
    Ben-Ur Z; Mijiritsky E; Gorfil C; Brosh T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):526-32. PubMed ID: 10220656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The strength of multiple major connector designs under simulated functional loading.
    Pienkos TE; Morris WJ; Gronet PM; Cameron SM; Looney SW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):299-304. PubMed ID: 17547949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Study of deflections in maxillary major connectors: a finite element analysis.
    Bhojaraju N; Srilakshmi J; Vishwanath G
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2014 Mar; 14(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 24604998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Removable partial denture design: a study of a selected population in Saudi Arabia.
    Sadig WM; Idowu AT
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2002 Nov; 3(4):40-53. PubMed ID: 12444401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prevalence of removable partial dentures users treated at the Aracatuba Dental School-UNESP.
    Pellizzer EP; Almeida DA; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Sánchez DM; Zuim PR; Verri FR
    Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 22428988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The significance of major connectors and denture base mucosal contacts on the functional strain patterns of maxillary removable partial dentures.
    Fernandes CP; Glantz PO
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1998 Jun; 6(2):63-74. PubMed ID: 9927921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Split palatal bar as a stress-breaker for a Kennedy Class II maxillary removable partial denture.
    Morris JC; Khan Z
    Gen Dent; 1986; 34(6):486-7. PubMed ID: 3552866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A survey of removable partial denture casts and major connector designs found in commercial laboratories, Athens, Greece.
    Polychronakis N; Sotiriou M; Zissis A
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Apr; 22(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 23387290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of anchorage on the accuracy of fit in removable partial denture framework.
    Gowri V; Patil NP; Nadiger RK; Guttal SS
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Jul; 19(5):387-90. PubMed ID: 20456025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A photoelastic study of a split palatal major connector.
    Reitz PV; Sanders JL; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Jan; 51(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 6366195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of Oral Morphology on Speech Production in Subjects Wearing Maxillary Removable Partial Dentures with Major Connectors.
    Wada J; Hideshima M; Inukai S; Katsuki A; Matsuura H; Wakabayashi N
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2018; 70(3-4):138-148. PubMed ID: 30138930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.