190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12873176)
1. Accurate Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma in prostate needle biopsies by general pathologists.
Renshaw AA; Schultz D; Cote K; Loffredo M; Ziemba DE; D'Amico AV
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2003 Aug; 127(8):1007-8. PubMed ID: 12873176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gleason grading of prostate cancer in needle core biopsies: a comparison of general and urologic pathologists.
Al-Maghrabi JA; Bakshi NA; Farsi HM
Ann Saudi Med; 2013; 33(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 23458939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in Japan and the United States.
Oyama T; Allsbrook WC; Kurokawa K; Matsuda H; Segawa A; Sano T; Suzuki K; Epstein JI
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Aug; 129(8):1004-10. PubMed ID: 16048389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gleason grading of prostate cancer: level of concordance between pathologists at the University Hospital of the West Indies.
Coard KC; Freeman VL
Am J Clin Pathol; 2004 Sep; 122(3):373-6. PubMed ID: 15362366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Concordance of Gleason histological scoring for prostatic cancer in needle biopsies and the surgical piece obtained during radical prostatectomy].
Arellano L; Castillo O; Metrebián E
Rev Med Chil; 2004 Aug; 132(8):971-8. PubMed ID: 15478299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: urologic pathologists.
Allsbrook WC; Mangold KA; Johnson MH; Lane RB; Lane CG; Amin MB; Bostwick DG; Humphrey PA; Jones EC; Reuter VE; Sakr W; Sesterhenn IA; Troncoso P; Wheeler TM; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2001 Jan; 32(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 11172298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.
Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of Grading Gleason Score 7 Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Needle Biopsy: Influence of Percent Pattern 4 and Other Histological Factors.
Meliti A; Sadimin E; Diolombi M; Khani F; Epstein JI
Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):681-685. PubMed ID: 28155999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma using tissue microarrays.
De la Taille A; Viellefond A; Berger N; Boucher E; De Fromont M; Fondimare A; Molinié V; Piron D; Sibony M; Staroz F; Triller M; Peltier E; Thiounn N; Rubin MA
Hum Pathol; 2003 May; 34(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 12792917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Should a Gleason score be assigned to a minute focus of carcinoma on prostate biopsy?
Rubin MA; Dunn R; Kambham N; Misick CP; O'Toole KM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2000 Dec; 24(12):1634-40. PubMed ID: 11117784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interobserver variability in Gleason histological grading of prostate cancer.
Ozkan TA; Eruyar AT; Cebeci OO; Memik O; Ozcan L; Kuskonmaz I
Scand J Urol; 2016 Dec; 50(6):420-424. PubMed ID: 27416104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the Use of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Pathologist Assessment to Review and Grade Prostate Biopsies.
Steiner DF; Nagpal K; Sayres R; Foote DJ; Wedin BD; Pearce A; Cai CJ; Winter SR; Symonds M; Yatziv L; Kapishnikov A; Brown T; Flament-Auvigne I; Tan F; Stumpe MC; Jiang PP; Liu Y; Chen PC; Corrado GS; Terry M; Mermel CH
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Nov; 3(11):e2023267. PubMed ID: 33180129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Review by urological pathologists improves the accuracy of Gleason grading by general pathologists.
Nakai Y; Tanaka N; Shimada K; Konishi N; Miyake M; Anai S; Fujimoto K
BMC Urol; 2015 Jul; 15():70. PubMed ID: 26201393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inter-observer reproducibility before and after web-based education in the Gleason grading of the prostate adenocarcinoma among the Iranian pathologists.
Abdollahi A; Sheikhbahaei S; Meysamie A; Bakhshandeh M; Hosseinzadeh H
Acta Med Iran; 2014; 52(5):370-4. PubMed ID: 24902017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Classic and International Society of Urological Pathology 2005 Modified Gleason grading using needle biopsies from the Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events (REDUCE) trial.
Lucia MS; Bostwick DG; Somerville MC; Fowler IL; Rittmaster RS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Dec; 137(12):1740-6. PubMed ID: 24283854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of concordance of Gleason score between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy.
Mansouri N; Msakni I; Gargouri F; Khiari R; Bouziani A; Laabidi B
Tunis Med; 2018 Jul; 96(7):430-436. PubMed ID: 30430487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading: evaluation using prostate cancer tissue microarrays.
Burchardt M; Engers R; Müller M; Burchardt T; Willers R; Epstein JI; Ackermann R; Gabbert HE; de la Taille A; Rubin MA
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2008 Oct; 134(10):1071-8. PubMed ID: 18392850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gleason score on biopsy: is it reliable for predicting the final grade on pathology?
Lattouf JB; Saad F
BJU Int; 2002 Nov; 90(7):694-8; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 12410749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gleason Score Correlation Between Prostate Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Materials.
Yeldir N; Yildiz E; Dündar G
Turk Patoloji Derg; 2019; 35(3):185-192. PubMed ID: 30859516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
