These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12873783)

  • 21. Labor induction with 25 microg versus 50 microg intravaginal misoprostol: a systematic review.
    Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM; Delke I
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jan; 99(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 11777525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intracervical misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for labor induction.
    Chang YK; Chen WH; Yu MH; Liu HS
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Jan; 80(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 12527456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (1):CD000941. PubMed ID: 12535398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Oral misoprostol and intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized comparison.
    Bartha JL; Comino-Delgado R; Garcia-Benasach F; Martinez-Del-Fresno P; Moreno-Corral LJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Sep; 96(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 10960643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effectiveness and safety of a new vaginal misoprostol product specifically labeled for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Cecatti JG; Tedesco RP; Pires HM; Calderon IM; Faúndes A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(6):706-11. PubMed ID: 16752263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Sciscione AC; Nguyen L; Manley J; Pollock M; Maas B; Colmorgen G
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Apr; 97(4):603-7. PubMed ID: 11275035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Oral misoprostol and intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized comparison.
    O'Flaherty L
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2001; 46(3):203-4. PubMed ID: 11480753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Votipka JR
    J Fam Pract; 1997 Jul; 45(1):20. PubMed ID: 9228905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Preinduction cervical ripening techniques compared.
    Greybush M; Singleton C; Atlas RO; Balducci J; Rust OA
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Jan; 46(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 11209625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Ham D; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 180(5):1155-60. PubMed ID: 10329871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cervical ripening and induction of labor by prostaglandin E2: a comparison between intracervical gel and vaginal pessary.
    D'Aniello G; Bocchi C; Florio P; Ignacchiti E; Guidoni CG; Centini G; Cito G; Picciolini E; Severi FM; Petraglia F
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Sep; 14(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 14694970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Labor induction post-term with 25 micrograms vs. 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol.
    Meydanli MM; Calişkan E; Burak F; Narin MA; Atmaca R
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Jun; 81(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 12767565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review of the literature.
    Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Sep; 43(3):475-88. PubMed ID: 10949752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening at term: comparison of outpatient vs. inpatient administration.
    Chang DW; Velazquez MD; Colyer M; Klaus P; Mallipeddi SK; Rayburn WF
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Oct; 50(10):735-9. PubMed ID: 16320553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bishop score and the outcome of labor induction with misoprostol.
    Szczesny W; Kjøllesdal M; Karlsson B; Nielsen S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(5):579-82. PubMed ID: 16752237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prospective randomised controlled trial to compare safety and efficacy of intravaginal Misoprostol with intracervical Cerviprime for induction of labour with unfavourable cervix.
    Krithika KS; Aggarwal N; Suri V
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Apr; 28(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 18569471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Induction of labor by prostaglandin E(2) in relation to the Bishop score.
    Kemp B; Winkler M; Rath W
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2000 Oct; 71(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 11044536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Isonicotinic acid hydrazide (INH): A new agent for cervical ripening at term.
    Haghighi L; Mohabatian B
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Apr; 35(3):251-4. PubMed ID: 25244665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of changes in pre-induction cervical factors' scores following ripening with transcervical foley catheter and intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji AO; Olayemi O; Odukogbe AA; Aimakhu CO; Oladokun A; Akindele FO; Adeniji OI; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2005 Dec; 34(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 16752669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Intracervical prostaglandins for induction of labour.
    Boulvain M; Kelly A; Irion O
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jan; (1):CD006971. PubMed ID: 18254122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.