These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12873843)

  • 1. Online versus offline processing of visual feedback in the production of component submovements.
    Khan MA; Franks IM
    J Mot Behav; 2003 Sep; 35(3):285-95. PubMed ID: 12873843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of practice on component submovements is dependent on the availability of visual feedback.
    Khan MA; Franks IM
    J Mot Behav; 2000 Sep; 32(3):227-40. PubMed ID: 10975271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual control of manual aiming movements in 6- to 10-year-old children and adults.
    Lhuisset L; Proteau L
    J Mot Behav; 2004 Jun; 36(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 15130867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the role of visual afferent information for the control of aiming movements toward targets of different sizes.
    Proteau L; Isabelle G
    J Mot Behav; 2002 Dec; 34(4):367-84. PubMed ID: 12446251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determinants of offline processing of visual information for the control of reaching movements.
    Bernier PM; Chua R; Franks IM; Khan MA
    J Mot Behav; 2006 Sep; 38(5):331-8. PubMed ID: 16968678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The contribution of peripheral and central vision in the control of movement amplitude.
    Lawrence GP; Khan MA; Buckolz E; Oldham AR
    Hum Mov Sci; 2006 Jun; 25(3):326-38. PubMed ID: 16616964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Online versus offline processing of visual feedback in the control of movement amplitude.
    Khan MA; Lawrence G; Fourkas A; Franks IM; Elliott D; Pembroke S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2003 May; 113(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 12679045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inferring online and offline processing of visual feedback in target-directed movements from kinematic data.
    Khan MA; Franks IM; Elliott D; Lawrence GP; Chua R; Bernier PM; Hansen S; Weeks DJ
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2006; 30(8):1106-21. PubMed ID: 16839604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of online control: a developmental perspective.
    McKay SM; Weir PL
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2004; 25(3):299-320. PubMed ID: 15148001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence for continuous processing of visual information in a manual video-aiming task.
    Proteau L; Roujoula A; Messier J
    J Mot Behav; 2009 May; 41(3):219-31. PubMed ID: 19366655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Specificity of practice, visual information, and intersegmental dynamics in rapid-aiming limb movements.
    Yoshida M; Cauraugh JH; Chow JW
    J Mot Behav; 2004 Sep; 36(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 15262624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A ménage à trois: the eye, the hand and on-line processing.
    Starkes J; Helsen W; Elliott D
    J Sports Sci; 2002 Mar; 20(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 11999477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Separating brain regions involved in internally guided and visual feedback control of moving effectors: an event-related fMRI study.
    Ogawa K; Inui T; Sugio T
    Neuroimage; 2006 Oct; 32(4):1760-70. PubMed ID: 16863694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What causes specificity of practice in a manual aiming movement: vision dominance or transformation errors?
    Proteau L; Carnahan H
    J Mot Behav; 2001 Sep; 33(3):226-34. PubMed ID: 11495827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Constant error in aiming movements without visual feedback is higher in the preferred hand.
    Lenhard A; Hoffmann J
    Laterality; 2007 May; 12(3):227-38. PubMed ID: 17454573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rapid online correction is selectively suppressed during movement with a visuomotor transformation.
    Gritsenko V; Kalaska JF
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Dec; 104(6):3084-104. PubMed ID: 20844106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual and haptic feedback contribute to tuning and online control during object manipulation.
    Huang FC; Gillespie RB; Kuo AD
    J Mot Behav; 2007 May; 39(3):179-93. PubMed ID: 17550870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Practice and Component Submovements: The Roles of Programming and Feedback in Rapid Aimed Limb Movements.
    Pratt J; Abrams RA
    J Mot Behav; 1996 Jun; 28(2):149-156. PubMed ID: 12529216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can a visual representation support the online control of memory-dependent reaching? Evident from a variable spatial mapping paradigm.
    Heath M; Westwood DA
    Motor Control; 2003 Oct; 7(4):346-61. PubMed ID: 14999133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal control strategies under different feedback schedules: kinematic evidence.
    Khan MA; Elliot D; Coull J; Chua R; Lyons J
    J Mot Behav; 2002 Mar; 34(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 11880249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.