206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1287394)
1. Fundamental frequency as an acoustic cue to accent perception.
Hasegawa Y; Hata K
Lang Speech; 1992; 35 ( Pt 1-2)():87-98. PubMed ID: 1287394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perception of acoustic cues to Tokyo Japanese pitch-accent contrasts in native Japanese and naive English listeners.
Shport IA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):307-18. PubMed ID: 26233031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of f
Sugiyama Y; Hui CTJ; Arai T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Oct; 150(4):2865. PubMed ID: 34717491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perception of Japanese Pitch Accent without F0.
Sugiyama Y
Phonetica; 2017; 74(2):107-123. PubMed ID: 28384645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pre-Low Raising in Japanese Pitch Accent.
Lee A; Prom-On S; Xu Y
Phonetica; 2017; 74(4):231-246. PubMed ID: 28301854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perception of the Lexical Accent Contrast in One Variety of East Norwegian.
Kelly NE; Smiljanić R
Lang Speech; 2018 Sep; 61(3):339-357. PubMed ID: 28653551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Focus perception in Japanese: Effects of lexical accent and focus location.
Lee A; Chiu F; Xu Y
PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0274176. PubMed ID: 36137111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. When pitch Accents Encode Speaker Commitment: Evidence from French Intonation.
Michelas A; Portes C; Champagne-Lavau M
Lang Speech; 2016 Jun; 59(Pt 2):266-93. PubMed ID: 27363256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The interdependence of tonal and durational cues in the perception of rhythmic groups.
Cumming RE
Phonetica; 2010; 67(4):219-42. PubMed ID: 21525778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interspeaker variability in emphatic accent production in French.
Dahan D; Bernard JM
Lang Speech; 1996; 39 ( Pt 4)():341-74. PubMed ID: 9156500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perception of terminal fall contours in speech produced by deaf persons.
Rubin-Spitz J; McGarr NS
J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):174-80. PubMed ID: 2314077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the variability in F0 patterning and the function of F0 timing in languages where pitch cues stress.
Thorsen N
Phonetica; 1982; 39(4-5):302-16. PubMed ID: 7156210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dimension-Based Statistical Learning Affects Both Speech Perception and Production.
Lehet M; Holt LL
Cogn Sci; 2017 Apr; 41 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):885-912. PubMed ID: 27666146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The perception of prominence patterns.
Kohler KJ
Phonetica; 2008; 65(4):257-69. PubMed ID: 19221454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acoustic Sources of Accent in Second Language Japanese Speech.
Idemaru K; Wei P; Gubbins L
Lang Speech; 2019 Jun; 62(2):333-357. PubMed ID: 29764295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The perception of intonation questions and statements in Cantonese.
Ma JK; Ciocca V; Whitehill TL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):1012-23. PubMed ID: 21361457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The language- specific interdependence of tonal and durational cues in perceived rhythmicality.
Cumming RE
Phonetica; 2011; 68(1-2):1-25. PubMed ID: 21804331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of fundamental frequency and duration variation on the perception of South Kyungsang Korean tones.
Chang SE
Lang Speech; 2013 Jun; 56(Pt 2):211-28. PubMed ID: 23905281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Information for Mandarin tones in the amplitude contour and in brief segments.
Whalen DH; Xu Y
Phonetica; 1992; 49(1):25-47. PubMed ID: 1603839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Tale of Two Features: Perception of Cantonese Lexical Tone and English Lexical Stress in Cantonese-English Bilinguals.
Tong X; Lee SM; Lee MM; Burnham D
PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142896. PubMed ID: 26606073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
