These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12874659)

  • 1. Mutual information as an index of diagnostic test performance.
    Benish WA
    Methods Inf Med; 2003; 42(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 12874659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intuitive and axiomatic arguments for quantifying diagnostic test performance in units of information.
    Benish WA
    Methods Inf Med; 2009; 48(6):552-7. PubMed ID: 19562229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The channel capacity of a diagnostic test as a function of test sensitivity and test specificity.
    Benish WA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Dec; 24(6):1044-52. PubMed ID: 22368178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of information graphs to evaluate and compare diagnostic tests.
    Benish WA
    Methods Inf Med; 2002; 41(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 12061117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The partial area under the summary ROC curve.
    Walter SD
    Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is the area under an ROC curve a valid measure of the performance of a screening or diagnostic test?
    Wald NJ; Bestwick JP
    J Med Screen; 2014 Mar; 21(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 24407586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating diagnostic tests: The area under the ROC curve and the balance of errors.
    Hand DJ
    Stat Med; 2010 Jun; 29(14):1502-10. PubMed ID: 20087877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informational analysis: a Shannon theoretic approach to measure the performance of a diagnostic test.
    Girometti R; Fabris F
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2015 Sep; 53(9):899-910. PubMed ID: 25894466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Beyond the 2×2 -contingency table: a primer on entropies and mutual information in various scenarios involving m diagnostic categories and n categories of diagnostic tests.
    Reibnegger G
    Clin Chim Acta; 2013 Oct; 425():97-103. PubMed ID: 23886553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Notes on the overlap measure as an alternative to the Youden index: How are they related?
    Samawi HM; Yin J; Rochani H; Panchal V
    Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(26):4230-4240. PubMed ID: 28809042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
    Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The predictive characteristics of D-dimer testing in outpatients with suspected venous thromboembolism: a Bayesian approach.
    Risch L; Monn A; Lüthy R; Honegger H; Huber AR
    Clin Chim Acta; 2004 Jul; 345(1-2):79-87. PubMed ID: 15193980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment.
    Mandrekar JN
    J Thorac Oncol; 2010 Sep; 5(9):1315-6. PubMed ID: 20736804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using confidence intervals to compare several correlated areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves.
    Zou GY; Yue L
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(29):5077-90. PubMed ID: 23824874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic accuracy measures.
    Eusebi P
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013; 36(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 24135733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal two-phase sampling for estimating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
    Wu Y
    Stat Med; 2021 Feb; 40(4):1059-1071. PubMed ID: 33210339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimum binary cut-off threshold of a diagnostic test: comparison of different methods using Monte Carlo technique.
    Reibnegger G; Schrabmair W
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2014 Nov; 14():99. PubMed ID: 25421000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian estimation of the receiver operating characteristic curve for a diagnostic test with a limit of detection in the absence of a gold standard.
    Jafarzadeh SR; Johnson WO; Utts JM; Gardner IA
    Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2090-106. PubMed ID: 20603894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ROC methodology within a monitoring framework.
    Parker CB; DeLong ER
    Stat Med; 2003 Nov; 22(22):3473-88. PubMed ID: 14601014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.