These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12874664)

  • 21. Comparison of artificial neural network and multiple linear regression in the optimization of formulation parameters of leuprolide acetate loaded liposomes.
    Arulsudar N; Subramanian N; Muthy RS
    J Pharm Pharm Sci; 2005 Aug; 8(2):243-58. PubMed ID: 16124936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prognostic scoring systems: which one is best?
    Feldman C
    Curr Opin Infect Dis; 2007 Apr; 20(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 17496575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Community-acquired pneumonia: development of a bedside predictive model and scoring system to identify the aetiology.
    Ruiz-González A; Falguera M; Vives M; Nogués A; Porcel JM; Rubio-Caballero M
    Respir Med; 2000 May; 94(5):505-10. PubMed ID: 10868716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient, pneumonia severity index and outcomes in patients hospitalized with community acquired pneumonia.
    Moammar MQ; Azam HM; Blamoun AI; Rashid AO; Ismail M; Khan MA; DeBari VA
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2008 Sep; 35(9):1032-7. PubMed ID: 18518885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prediction on lengths of stay in the postanesthesia care unit following general anesthesia: preliminary study of the neural network and logistic regression modelling.
    Kim WO; Kil HK; Kang JW; Park HR
    J Korean Med Sci; 2000 Feb; 15(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 10719804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The use of neural networks and logistic regression analysis for predicting pathological stage in men undergoing radical prostatectomy: a population based study.
    Borque A; Sanz G; Allepuz C; Plaza L; Gil P; Rioja LA
    J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1672-8. PubMed ID: 11586200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Data strip mining for the virtual design of pharmaceuticals with neural networks.
    Kewley RH; Embrechts MJ; Breneman C
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw; 2000; 11(3):668-79. PubMed ID: 18249794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of artificial neural networks with logistic regression in prediction of gallbladder disease among obese patients.
    Liew PL; Lee YC; Lin YC; Lee TS; Lee WJ; Wang W; Chien CW
    Dig Liver Dis; 2007 Apr; 39(4):356-62. PubMed ID: 17317348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Artificial neural networks for predicting failure to survive following in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
    Ebell MH
    J Fam Pract; 1993 Mar; 36(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 8454976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The impact of available experimental data on the prediction of 1H NMR chemical shifts by neural networks.
    Binev Y; Corvo M; Aires-de-Sousa J
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(3):946-9. PubMed ID: 15154761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Community-acquired pneumonia as medical emergency: predictors of early deterioration.
    Kolditz M; Ewig S; Klapdor B; Schütte H; Winning J; Rupp J; Suttorp N; Welte T; Rohde G;
    Thorax; 2015 Jun; 70(6):551-8. PubMed ID: 25782758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prognosis factors and outcome of community-acquired pneumonia needing mechanical ventilation.
    Tejerina E; Frutos-Vivar F; Restrepo MI; Anzueto A; Palizas F; González M; Apezteguía C; Abroug F; Matamis D; Bugedo G; Esteban A;
    J Crit Care; 2005 Sep; 20(3):230-8. PubMed ID: 16253791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predicting outcomes of trials of labor in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a comparison of multivariate methods with neural networks.
    Macones GA; Hausman N; Edelstein R; Stamilio DM; Marder SJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Feb; 184(3):409-13. PubMed ID: 11228495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Statistical approach to neural network model building for gentamicin peak predictions.
    Smith BP; Brier ME
    J Pharm Sci; 1996 Jan; 85(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 8926586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Applying artificial neural networks to predict communication risks in the emergency department.
    Bagnasco A; Siri A; Aleo G; Rocco G; Sasso L
    J Adv Nurs; 2015 Oct; 71(10):2293-304. PubMed ID: 26010174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of an artificial neural network to predict urea nitrogen appearance for critically ill multiple-trauma patients.
    Dickerson RN; Mason DL; Croce MA; Minard G; Brown RO
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2005; 29(6):429-35. PubMed ID: 16224036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Artificial neural networks in analysis of indinavir and its degradation products retention.
    Jancić-Stojanović B; Ivanović D; Malenović A; Medenica M
    Talanta; 2009 Apr; 78(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 19174211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prediction of bladder outlet obstruction in men with lower urinary tract symptoms using artificial neural networks.
    Sonke GS; Heskes T; Verbeek AL; de la Rosette JJ; Kiemeney LA
    J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):300-5. PubMed ID: 10604380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Diagnosing breast cancer from FNAs: variable relevance in neural network and logistic regression models.
    Ohno-Machado L; Bialek D
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 1():537-40. PubMed ID: 10384515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Diagnosis of sensorineural hearing loss with neural networks versus logistic regression modeling of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Ziavra N; Kastanioudakis I; Trikalinos TA; Skevas A; Ioannidis JP
    Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 14981356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.