BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12875275)

  • 1. Behavioral health issue brief: California's Proposition 36 and other state diversion programs: moving drug offenders out of prison and into treatment: year end report-2002.
    Colker AC
    Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2002 Dec; ():1-23. PubMed ID: 12875275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Behavioral health issue brief: California's Proposition 36 and other state diversion programs: moving drug offenders out of prison and into treatment: year end report-2003.
    Colker AC
    Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2003 Dec; ():1-24. PubMed ID: 14870722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proposition 36: issues and challenges.
    Jett KP
    J Psychoactive Drugs; 2001; 33(4):321-8. PubMed ID: 11824690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treating drug-abusing offenders. Initial findings from a five-county study on the impact of California's Proposition 36 on the treatment system and patient outcomes.
    Hser YI; Teruya C; Evans EA; Longshore D; Grella C; Farabee D
    Eval Rev; 2003 Oct; 27(5):479-505. PubMed ID: 14531316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Drug treatment program compliance and resistance activities during implementation of California's Proposition 36.
    Reynolds G
    J Health Hum Serv Adm; 2009; 32(1):85-106. PubMed ID: 19558034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Behavioral health issue brief: parity and other insurance mandates for the treatment of mental illness and substance abuse: year end report-2003.
    Colker AC; McKinley A
    Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2003 Dec; ():1-36. PubMed ID: 14870729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Behavioral health issue brief: co-occurring mental illness and drug addiction treatment: overview and bibliography: year end report - 2002.
    Colker AC; Crean E
    Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2002 Dec; ():1-10. PubMed ID: 12809142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Offender diversion into substance use disorder treatment: the economic impact of California's proposition 36.
    Anglin MD; Nosyk B; Jaffe A; Urada D; Evans E
    Am J Public Health; 2013 Jun; 103(6):1096-102. PubMed ID: 23597352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Behavioral health issue brief: state budget actions that affect public mental health services and systems: year end report-2003.
    McKinley A
    Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2003 Dec; ():1-35. PubMed ID: 14870731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictors of short-term treatment outcomes among California's Proposition 36 participants.
    Hser YI; Evans E; Teruya C; Huang D; Anglin MD
    Eval Program Plann; 2007 May; 30(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 17689324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diversion programs for impaired physicians.
    Ikeda R; Pelton C
    West J Med; 1990 May; 152(5):617-21. PubMed ID: 2349803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An analysis of contracts for the delivery of managed behavioral health care services in state correctional facilities.
    Mauery DR; Teitelbaum J; Lerman J; Rosenbaum S
    Issue Brief George Wash Univ Cent Health Serv Res Policy; 2002 Feb; (15-16):1-49. PubMed ID: 14982084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Departments of corrections as purchasers of community-based treatment: a national study.
    Kubiak SP; Arfken CL; Gibson ES
    J Subst Abuse Treat; 2009 Jun; 36(4):420-7. PubMed ID: 19004602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. One year return to custody rates among co-disordered offenders.
    Messina N; Burdon W; Hagopian G; Prendergast M
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(4):503-18. PubMed ID: 15282837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conviction for addiction: states are reconsidering whether no-nonsense drug policy should mean prison or treatment.
    Lyons D
    State Legis; 2002 Jun; 28(6):18-21. PubMed ID: 12051252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correctional treatment for co-occurring disorders: results of a national survey.
    Peters RH; LeVasseur ME; Chandler RK
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(4):563-84. PubMed ID: 15282840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disparities in criminal court referrals to drug treatment and prison for minority men.
    Nicosia N; Macdonald JM; Arkes J
    Am J Public Health; 2013 Jun; 103(6):e77-84. PubMed ID: 23597342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Therapeutic jurisprudence: judicial and corrections panel.
    Jessup M
    J Psychoactive Drugs; 2001; 33(4):355-67. PubMed ID: 11824695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of California's Proposition 36 on the drug treatment system: treatment capacity and displacement.
    Hser YI; Teruya C; Brown AH; Huang D; Evans E; Anglin MD
    Am J Public Health; 2007 Jan; 97(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 17138930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incorporating a public health approach in drug law: lessons from local expansion of treatment capacity and access under California's Proposition 36.
    Klein D; Miller RE; Noble A; Speiglman R
    Milbank Q; 2004; 82(4):723-57. PubMed ID: 15595948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.