224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12875477)
1. Measurement of arm blood pressure using different oscillometry manometers compared to auscultatory readings.
Shahriari M; Rotenberg DK; Nielsen JK; Wiinberg N; Nielsen PE
Blood Press; 2003; 12(3):155-9. PubMed ID: 12875477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist with an upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer.
Rogers P; Burke V; Stroud P; Puddey IB
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1999; 26(5-6):477-81. PubMed ID: 10386242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Wrist blood pressure-measuring devices: a comparative study of accuracy with a standard auscultatory method using a mercury manometer.
Altunkan S; Yildiz S; Azer S
Blood Press Monit; 2002 Oct; 7(5):281-4. PubMed ID: 12409888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the Microlife Watch BP Office professional device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International protocol.
Stergiou GS; Tzamouranis D; Protogerou A; Nasothimiou E; Kapralos C
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Oct; 13(5):299-303. PubMed ID: 18799957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and reliability of wrist-cuff devices for self-measurement of blood pressure.
Kikuya M; Chonan K; Imai Y; Goto E; Ishii M;
J Hypertens; 2002 Apr; 20(4):629-38. PubMed ID: 11910297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of semiautomatic and automatic devices for home blood pressure measurement: comparison between cuff-oscillometric and microphone methods.
Imai Y; Abe K; Sasaki S; Minami N; Munakata M; Sakuma H; Hashimoto J; Sekino H; Imai K; Yoshinaga K
J Hypertens; 1989 Dec; 7(12):983-90. PubMed ID: 2628499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of an automated oscillometric blood pressure wrist device.
Cuckson AC; Moran P; Seed P; Reinders A; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 15021076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of a new wrist cuff oscillometric blood pressure device: comparisons with intraarterial and mercury manometer measurements.
Watson S; Wenzel RR; di Matteo C; Meier B; Lüscher TF
Am J Hypertens; 1998 Dec; 11(12):1469-74. PubMed ID: 9880129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of blood pressure and pulse pressure values obtained by oscillometric and central measurements in hypertensive patients.
Kayrak M; Ulgen MS; Yazici M; Yilmaz R; Demir K; Dogan Y; Ozhan H; Alihanoglu Y; Koc F; Bodur S
Blood Press; 2010 Apr; 19(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 20070247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the Omron RS6 wrist blood pressure monitor with the positioning sensor on or off with a standard mercury sphygmomanometer.
Deutsch C; Krüger R; Saito K; Yamashita S; Sawanoi Y; Beime B; Bramlage P
Blood Press Monit; 2014 Oct; 19(5):306-13. PubMed ID: 25000543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Auscultatory versus oscillometric blood pressure measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation and arterial hypertension.
Šelmytė-Besusparė A; Barysienė J; Petrikonytė D; Aidietis A; Marinskis G; Laucevičius A
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Mar; 17(1):87. PubMed ID: 28335730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simultaneous validation of the SunTech 247 diagnostic station blood pressure measurement device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol, the International Protocol and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standards.
Polo Friz H; Facchetti R; Primitz L; Beltrame L; Galbiati V; Ricioppo A; Bombelli M; Sega R
Blood Press Monit; 2009 Oct; 14(5):222-7. PubMed ID: 19741510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Auscultatory versus oscillometric measurement of blood pressure in octogenarians.
Rosholm JU; Arnspang S; Matzen L; Jacobsen IA
Blood Press; 2012 Oct; 21(5):269-72. PubMed ID: 22545576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the Omron HEM-637 wrist monitor to the auscultation method with the wrist position sensor on or disabled.
Yarows SA
Am J Hypertens; 2004 Jan; 17(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 14700513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Omboni S; Riva I; Giglio A; Caldara G; Groppelli A; Parati G
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 17625396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy and 'range of uncertainty' of oscillometric blood pressure monitors around the upper arm and the wrist.
Dieterle T; Battegay E; Bucheli B; Martina B
Blood Press Monit; 1998; 3(6):339-46. PubMed ID: 10212375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of overcuffing on the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
Ringrose J; Millay J; Babwick SA; Neil M; Langkaas LA; Padwal R
J Am Soc Hypertens; 2015 Jul; 9(7):563-8. PubMed ID: 26101170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device.
Pavan MV; Saura GE; Korkes HA; Nascimento KM; Madeira Neto ND; Dávila R; Rodrigues CI; Almeida FA
J Bras Nefrol; 2012 Mar; 34(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22441181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
