136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12875504)
1. From Hendricks to Crane: the sexually violent predator trilogy and the inchoate jurisprudence of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Sarkar SP
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 12875504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Sexually violent predator laws: psychiatry in service to a morally dubious enterprise.
Janus ES
Lancet; 2004 Dec; 364 Suppl 1():s50-1. PubMed ID: 15967153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Kansas v. Hendricks: is it time to lock the door and throw away the key for sexually violent predators?
Kolebuck MD
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1998; 14(2):537-62. PubMed ID: 9693491
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Kansas v. Hendricks.
Grudzinskas AJ; Henry MG
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(4):607-12. PubMed ID: 9460048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. After Hendricks: defining constitutional treatment for Washington State's Civil commitment program.
Lieb R
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Jun; 989():474-88. PubMed ID: 12839920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Expert testimony in sexually violent predator commitments: conceptualizing legal standards of "mental disorder" and "likely to reoffend".
Sreenivasan S; Weinberger LE; Garrick T
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):471-85. PubMed ID: 14974803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inevitable recidivism--the origin and centrality of an urban legend.
Lave TR
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2011; 34(3):186-94. PubMed ID: 21596438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A population at risk: civil commitment of substance abusers after Kansas v. Hendricks.
Krongard ML
Calif Law Rev; 2002 Jan; 90(1):111-63. PubMed ID: 16506331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sexually violent predator II: the sequel.
Leong GB; Silva JA
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(3):340-3. PubMed ID: 11592464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Preventive confinement of dangerous offenders.
Morse SJ
J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(1):56-72. PubMed ID: 15152427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Sexual offender commitment in the United States: legislative and policy concerns.
Fitch WL
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Jun; 989():489-501. PubMed ID: 12839921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Policy interventions designed to combat sexual violence: community notification and civil commitment.
Levenson JS
J Child Sex Abus; 2003; 12(3-4):17-52. PubMed ID: 15308446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of sexually violent predator civil commitment criteria in Florida.
Levenson JS
Law Hum Behav; 2004 Aug; 28(4):357-68. PubMed ID: 15499820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sexual predator laws in Canada.
Glancy GD; Regehr C; Bradford J
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 11471791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk and the preventive detention of sex offenders in Australia and the United States.
Mercado CC; Ogloff JR
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 17157911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sexual predator commitment laws: lessons for law and the behavioral sciences.
Janus ES
Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 10736574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. U.S. Supreme Court upholds Kansas law allowing indefinite civil commitment of sexual offenders.
Psychiatr Serv; 1997 Aug; 48(8):1093-4. PubMed ID: 9255849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Loathing the sinner, medicalizing the sin: why sexually violent predator statutes are unjust.
Douard J
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 17157910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The future of involuntary civil commitment in the U.S.A. after Kansas v. Hendricks.
La Fond JQ
Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(2-3):153-67. PubMed ID: 10874286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The mythology of legal decision making.
Konecni VJ; Ebbesen EB
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1984; 7(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 6519866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
