These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12875504)

  • 1. From Hendricks to Crane: the sexually violent predator trilogy and the inchoate jurisprudence of the U.S. Supreme Court.
    Sarkar SP
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 12875504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexually violent predator laws: psychiatry in service to a morally dubious enterprise.
    Janus ES
    Lancet; 2004 Dec; 364 Suppl 1():s50-1. PubMed ID: 15967153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Kansas v. Hendricks: is it time to lock the door and throw away the key for sexually violent predators?
    Kolebuck MD
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1998; 14(2):537-62. PubMed ID: 9693491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Kansas v. Hendricks.
    Grudzinskas AJ; Henry MG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(4):607-12. PubMed ID: 9460048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. After Hendricks: defining constitutional treatment for Washington State's Civil commitment program.
    Lieb R
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Jun; 989():474-88. PubMed ID: 12839920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Expert testimony in sexually violent predator commitments: conceptualizing legal standards of "mental disorder" and "likely to reoffend".
    Sreenivasan S; Weinberger LE; Garrick T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):471-85. PubMed ID: 14974803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inevitable recidivism--the origin and centrality of an urban legend.
    Lave TR
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2011; 34(3):186-94. PubMed ID: 21596438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A population at risk: civil commitment of substance abusers after Kansas v. Hendricks.
    Krongard ML
    Calif Law Rev; 2002 Jan; 90(1):111-63. PubMed ID: 16506331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sexually violent predator II: the sequel.
    Leong GB; Silva JA
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(3):340-3. PubMed ID: 11592464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preventive confinement of dangerous offenders.
    Morse SJ
    J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(1):56-72. PubMed ID: 15152427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual offender commitment in the United States: legislative and policy concerns.
    Fitch WL
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Jun; 989():489-501. PubMed ID: 12839921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Policy interventions designed to combat sexual violence: community notification and civil commitment.
    Levenson JS
    J Child Sex Abus; 2003; 12(3-4):17-52. PubMed ID: 15308446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The biasing effect of the "sexually violent predator" label on legal decisions.
    Scurich N; Gongola J; Krauss DA
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 47():109-14. PubMed ID: 27206709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of sexually violent predator civil commitment criteria in Florida.
    Levenson JS
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Aug; 28(4):357-68. PubMed ID: 15499820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sexual predator laws in Canada.
    Glancy GD; Regehr C; Bradford J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 11471791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk and the preventive detention of sex offenders in Australia and the United States.
    Mercado CC; Ogloff JR
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 17157911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sexual predator commitment laws: lessons for law and the behavioral sciences.
    Janus ES
    Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 10736574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. U.S. Supreme Court upholds Kansas law allowing indefinite civil commitment of sexual offenders.
    Psychiatr Serv; 1997 Aug; 48(8):1093-4. PubMed ID: 9255849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Loathing the sinner, medicalizing the sin: why sexually violent predator statutes are unjust.
    Douard J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 17157910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The future of involuntary civil commitment in the U.S.A. after Kansas v. Hendricks.
    La Fond JQ
    Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(2-3):153-67. PubMed ID: 10874286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.