415 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12876012)
1. Preliminary interpretations of after-hours CT and sonography by radiology residents versus final interpretations by body imaging radiologists at a level 1 trauma center.
Carney E; Kempf J; DeCarvalho V; Yudd A; Nosher J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Aug; 181(2):367-73. PubMed ID: 12876012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preliminary radiology resident interpretations versus final attending radiologist interpretations and the impact on patient care in a community hospital.
Ruchman RB; Jaeger J; Wiggins EF; Seinfeld S; Thakral V; Bolla S; Wallach S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):523-6. PubMed ID: 17715095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Overnight resident interpretation of torso CT at a level 1 trauma center an analysis and review of the literature.
Chung JH; Strigel RM; Chew AR; Albrecht E; Gunn ML
Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1155-60. PubMed ID: 19481962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors involved in discrepant preliminary radiology resident interpretations of neuroradiological imaging studies: a retrospective analysis.
Bruni SG; Bartlett E; Yu E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jun; 198(6):1367-74. PubMed ID: 22623550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Discrepancies in interpretation of ED body computed tomographic scans by radiology residents.
Tieng N; Grinberg D; Li SF
Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Jan; 25(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 17157681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiology resident interpretations of on-call imaging studies: the incidence of major discrepancies.
Cooper VF; Goodhartz LA; Nemcek AA; Ryu RK
Acad Radiol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1198-204. PubMed ID: 18692761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Discrepancy rates of radiology resident interpretations of on-call neuroradiology MR imaging studies.
Filippi CG; Schneider B; Burbank HN; Alsofrom GF; Linnell G; Ratkovits B
Radiology; 2008 Dec; 249(3):972-9. PubMed ID: 19011191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of the RADPEER™ scoring language to interpretation discrepancies between diagnostic radiology residents and faculty radiologists.
Maloney E; Lomasney LM; Schomer L
J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Apr; 9(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 22469377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cross-sectional examination interpretation discrepancies between on-call diagnostic radiology residents and subspecialty faculty radiologists: analysis by imaging modality and subspecialty.
Ruma J; Klein KA; Chong S; Wesolowski J; Kazerooni EA; Ellis JH; Myles JD
J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Jun; 8(6):409-14. PubMed ID: 21636055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of training and experience in interpretation of emergency body CT scans.
Wechsler RJ; Spettell CM; Kurtz AB; Lev-Toaff AS; Halpern EJ; Nazarian LN; Feld RI; Needleman L; Alexander AA
Radiology; 1996 Jun; 199(3):717-20. PubMed ID: 8637994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identifying benchmarks for discrepancy rates in preliminary interpretations provided by radiology trainees at an academic institution.
Ruutiainen AT; Scanlon MH; Itri JN
J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Sep; 8(9):644-8. PubMed ID: 21889753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Head trauma: CT scan interpretation by radiology residents versus staff radiologists.
Wysoki MG; Nassar CJ; Koenigsberg RA; Novelline RA; Faro SH; Faerber EN
Radiology; 1998 Jul; 208(1):125-8. PubMed ID: 9646802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Discrepancy rates of on-call radiology residents' interpretations of CT angiography studies of the neck and circle of Willis.
Meyer RE; Nickerson JP; Burbank HN; Alsofrom GF; Linnell GJ; Filippi CG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Aug; 193(2):527-32. PubMed ID: 19620452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On-call musculoskeletal radiographs: discrepancy rates between radiology residents and musculoskeletal radiologists.
Kung JW; Melenevsky Y; Hochman MG; Didolkar MM; Yablon CM; Eisenberg RL; Wu JS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Apr; 200(4):856-9. PubMed ID: 23521460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Increased error rates in preliminary reports issued by radiology residents working more than 10 consecutive hours overnight.
Ruutiainen AT; Durand DJ; Scanlon MH; Itri JN
Acad Radiol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 23452475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of neuroradiology emergency MRI interpretations: low discrepancy rates between on-call radiology residents' preliminary interpretations and neuroradiologists' final reports.
Salca D; Lersy F; Willaume T; Stoessel M; Lefèvre A; Ardellier FD; Nicolaï C; Nouri A; Baloglu S; Bierry G; Chammas A; Kremer S
Eur Radiol; 2022 Oct; 32(10):7260-7269. PubMed ID: 35435441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of discrepancy rates in resident and faculty interpretations of on-call PE CT and V/Q scans: is one study more reliable during off hours?
Xiong L; Trout AT; Bailey JE; Brown RK; Kelly AM
J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Jun; 8(6):415-21. PubMed ID: 21636056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. After-hours emergency radiology CT reporting by radiology registrars at an Australian level 1 trauma centre: A review of discrepancies between preliminary and final reports.
Goh GS; Aberdein G; Chokka R; Yu X; Varma D
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Oct; 63(5):567-572. PubMed ID: 31250525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of preliminary interpretation of neurologic CT examinations by on-call radiology residents and assessment of patient outcomes at a level I trauma center.
Miyakoshi A; Nguyen QT; Cohen WA; Talner LB; Anzai Y
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Dec; 6(12):864-70. PubMed ID: 19945042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Overnight resident preliminary interpretations on CT examinations: should the process continue?
Strub WM; Vagal AA; Tomsick T; Moulton JS
Emerg Radiol; 2006 Oct; 13(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 16865357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
