These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Clinical evaluation of a flowable resin composite and flowable compomer for preventive resin restorations. Qin M; Liu H Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):580-7. PubMed ID: 16268391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part II: in vivo investigations. Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Frankenberger R Am J Dent; 2005 Apr; 18(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 15973822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bonded restorations for the prevention and treatment of the cracked-tooth syndrome. Geurtsen W; García-Godoy F Am J Dent; 1999 Dec; 12(6):266-70. PubMed ID: 10850244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. One-year clinical evaluation of an ethanol-based and a solvent-free dentin adhesive. Aw TC; Lepe X; Johnson GH; Mancl L Am J Dent; 2004 Dec; 17(6):451-6. PubMed ID: 15724760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of bonded and nonbonded amalgam in the treatment of teeth with incomplete fractures. Davis R; Overton JD J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Apr; 131(4):469-78. PubMed ID: 10770009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of resin-bonded partial coverage ceramic restorations to treat incomplete fractures in posterior teeth: a clinical report. Liebenberg WH Quintessence Int; 1996 Nov; 27(11):739-47. PubMed ID: 9161265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The evaluation of direct composite restorations for the worn mandibular anterior dentition - clinical performance and patient satisfaction. Poyser NJ; Briggs PF; Chana HS; Kelleher MG; Porter RW; Patel MM J Oral Rehabil; 2007 May; 34(5):361-76. PubMed ID: 17441877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel. Van Meerbeek B; Kanumilli P; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Peumans M Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 15766585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endodontic complications after plastic restorations in general practice. Whitworth JM; Myers PM; Smith J; Walls AW; McCabe JF Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 15910477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions. Peumans M; Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Dec; 113(6):512-8. PubMed ID: 16324142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations. Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized clinical trial of cusp-replacing resin composite restorations: efficiency and short-term effectiveness. Kuijs RH; Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Roeters FJ; Creugers NH; Burgersdijk RC Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 16900817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Gluma bonding system: a clinical evaluation of its various components for the treatment of hypersensitive root dentin. Davidson DF; Suzuki M J Can Dent Assoc; 1997 Jan; 63(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 9009533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The bonded amalgam restoration--a review of the literature and report of its use in the treatment of four cases of cracked-tooth syndrome. Bearn DR; Saunders EM; Saunders WP Quintessence Int; 1994 May; 25(5):321-6. PubMed ID: 7938416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up. Pollington S; van Noort R Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18435377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]