These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12877435)

  • 1. Modified matrix adaptation for sub-gingival Class II amalgam restorations.
    Chan DC
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):469-72. PubMed ID: 12877435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Custom matrix adaptation with elastic cords.
    Chan DC
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):419-22. PubMed ID: 11504444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technique on restoring sub-gingival cervical lesion.
    Chan DC; Adkins J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):350-3. PubMed ID: 15195740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture resistance of amalgam/glass-polyalkenoate open sandwich Class II restorations: an in vitro study.
    Roberts HW; Vandewalle KS; Charlton DG; Berzins DW
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):873-7. PubMed ID: 18692947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro study on the use of circumferential matrix bands in the placement of Class II amalgam restorations.
    Gilmour AS; James T; Bryant S; Gardner A; Stone D; Addy LD
    Br Dent J; 2008 Mar; 204(6):E10; discussion 310-1. PubMed ID: 18297049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A conservative technique for restoring a tooth affected by interproximal root caries.
    Gilboa I; Cardash HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):221-2. PubMed ID: 12616244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conservative restoration of proximal-cervical lesions.
    Setien V; Armstrong SR; Vargas MA
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(3):321-3. PubMed ID: 12760706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of sectional matrix systems in class II direct composite restorations.
    Lowe RA
    Dent Today; 2004 Oct; 23(10):108, 110-2. PubMed ID: 15559461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pre-contoured matrix bands for Class II amalgam restorations.
    Graham DA; Daniels JA; Kahl EA; Pelzner RB; Birtcil RF
    Gen Dent; 1980; 28(3):52-7. PubMed ID: 6936329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Bell system: direct resin methodology.
    Davis MW
    Dent Today; 2001 Feb; 20(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 12524857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Glass ionomer cements and future research.
    Mount GJ
    Am J Dent; 1994 Oct; 7(5):286-92. PubMed ID: 7986454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct placement restorative materials for use in posterior teeth: the current options.
    Lyons K;
    N Z Dent J; 2003 Mar; 99(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 15330384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A matrix system for class II amalgam restorations in primary molars.
    Gustafsson U; Magnusson B
    Swed Dent J; 1977; 1(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 268686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Technique on restoring cervical lesions.
    Matis BA; Cochran MA
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):525-7. PubMed ID: 12216573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simplified delivery of a resin-modified glass ionomer restorative.
    Margeas RC
    Dent Today; 2011 Mar; 30(3):110, 112-3. PubMed ID: 21485888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A technique for closing persistent open proximal contacts.
    Latcham N
    Aust Dent J; 1988 Dec; 33(6):476-7. PubMed ID: 3245808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stable matrix for amalgam build-up.
    Esquivel JF; Welsch BB
    Gen Dent; 1999; 47(4):396-8. PubMed ID: 10687468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Matrix band adaptation for "wraparound" Class II amalgams.
    Maibaum WW
    Gen Dent; 1991; 39(4):248-9. PubMed ID: 1916196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.