These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1287983)

  • 1. Shape discrimination and the judgement of perfect symmetry: dissociation of shape from size.
    Regan D; Hamstra SJ
    Vision Res; 1992 Oct; 32(10):1845-64. PubMed ID: 1287983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A direct comparison of visual discrimination of shape and size on a large range of aspect ratios.
    Abbas SS; Dijkstra TM; Heskes T
    Vision Res; 2013 Oct; 91():84-92. PubMed ID: 23942288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shape discrimination for motion-defined and contrast-defined form: squareness in special.
    Regan D; Hamstra S
    Perception; 1991; 20(3):315-36. PubMed ID: 1762874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Separate banks of information channels encode size and aspect ratio.
    Dickinson JE; Morgan SK; Tang MF; Badcock DR
    J Vis; 2017 Mar; 17(3):27. PubMed ID: 28362901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shape discrimination for rectangles defined by disparity alone, by disparity plus luminance and by disparity plus motion.
    Regan D; Hamstra SJ
    Vision Res; 1994 Sep; 34(17):2277-91. PubMed ID: 7941421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-dimensional aspect ratio discrimination for shape defined by orientation texture.
    Regan D; Hajdur LV; Hong XH
    Vision Res; 1996 Nov; 36(22):3695-702. PubMed ID: 8976999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The visual computation of 2-D area by human observers.
    Morgan MJ
    Vision Res; 2005 Sep; 45(19):2564-70. PubMed ID: 15904946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shape adaptation exaggerates shape differences.
    Storrs KR; Arnold DH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jan; 43(1):181-191. PubMed ID: 27808549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Convergence of boundary and body information in the visual processing of aspect ratio.
    Regan D; Regan MP; Harnanansingh D
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(20):3451-61. PubMed ID: 16750237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of perceptual contour orientation uncertainty on the tilt aftereffect.
    Erlikhman G; Singh G; Ghose T; Liu Z
    Vision Res; 2019 May; 158():126-134. PubMed ID: 30797766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How to tell circles from ellipses: perceiving the regularity of simple shapes.
    Zanker JM; Quenzer T
    Naturwissenschaften; 1999 Oct; 86(10):492-5. PubMed ID: 10541660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of normal aging on closed contour shape discrimination.
    McKendrick AM; Weymouth AE; Battista J
    J Vis; 2010 Feb; 10(2):1.1-9. PubMed ID: 20462302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Judging spatial properties of simple figures.
    Nachmias J
    Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(11):1290-6. PubMed ID: 18407313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrast threshold elevation following continuous and interrupted adaptation.
    Magnussen S; Greenlee MW
    Vision Res; 1986; 26(4):673-5. PubMed ID: 3739241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surround-contingent tilt aftereffect.
    Nakashima Y; Sugita Y
    J Vis; 2014 Dec; 14(14):5. PubMed ID: 25515763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simultaneous shape repulsion and global assimilation in the perception of aspect ratio.
    Sweeny TD; Grabowecky M; Suzuki S
    J Vis; 2011 Jan; 11(1):16. PubMed ID: 21248223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Non-linear global pooling in the discrimination of circular and non-circular shapes.
    Schmidtmann G; Kennedy GJ; Orbach HS; Loffler G
    Vision Res; 2012 Jun; 62():44-56. PubMed ID: 22429959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The cue for contour-curvature discrimination.
    Foster DH; Simmons DR; Cook MJ
    Vision Res; 1993 Feb; 33(3):329-41. PubMed ID: 8447105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contour adaptation.
    Anstis S
    J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 23447679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporal frequency discrimination above threshold.
    Mandler MB
    Vision Res; 1984; 24(12):1873-80. PubMed ID: 6534010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.