These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

450 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12881162)

  • 41. Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.
    McLean AP; Blampied NM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan; 75(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 11256865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Observing of chain-schedule stimuli.
    Slezak JM; Anderson KG
    Behav Processes; 2014 Jun; 105():19-27. PubMed ID: 24582929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Responding of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of signaled-delayed reinforcement: effects of delay-signal duration.
    Schaal DW; Branch MN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Jan; 53(1):103-21. PubMed ID: 2299283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Timeout postponement without increased reinforcement frequency.
    Pietras CJ; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Sep; 74(2):147-64. PubMed ID: 11029020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Interaction of methadone, reinforcement history, and variable-interval performance.
    Nader MA; Thompson T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Sep; 48(2):303-15. PubMed ID: 3681187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Training reinforcement rates, resistance to extinction, and the role of context in reinstatement.
    Miranda-Dukoski L; Bensemann J; Podlesnik CA
    Learn Behav; 2016 Mar; 44(1):29-48. PubMed ID: 26139290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The influence of intertrial interval food on extinction and devaluation in chain schedules.
    Bell MC; Goldenberg M; McDevitt MA
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Apr; 134(2):133-51. PubMed ID: 17503691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Concurrent performance as bouts of behavior.
    Smith TT; McLean AP; Shull RL; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Jul; 102(1):102-25. PubMed ID: 24861997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Conditioned reinforcement versus time to reinforcement in chain schedules.
    Williams BA; Royalty P
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 May; 53(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 2341821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Baseline response rates affect resistance to change.
    Kuroda T; Cook JE; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jan; 109(1):164-175. PubMed ID: 29094367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A good time to leave?: the sunk time effect in pigeons.
    Magalhães P; White KG
    Behav Processes; 2014 Jun; 105():1-5. PubMed ID: 24565982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Reinforcement omission in concurrent fixed-interval and random-interval schedules.
    Ishii T; Sakagami T
    Behav Processes; 2007 Mar; 74(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 17275211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The role of the response-reinforcer relation in delay-of-reinforcement effects.
    Williams AM; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Mar; 71(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 10220929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of a single free food presentation on extinction responding in a multiple schedule.
    Reiss AJ; Bell MC
    Behav Processes; 2016 Sep; 130():46-52. PubMed ID: 27423967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Signaling added response-independent reinforcement to assess Pavlovian processes in resistance to change and relapse.
    Podlesnik CA; Fleet JD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Sep; 102(2):179-97. PubMed ID: 25044232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Early extinction effects following intermittent reinforcement: Little evidence of extinction bursts.
    Lattal KA; Kuroda T; Cook JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 Jul; 114(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 32639050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Concurrent schedules: discriminating reinforcer-ratio reversals at a fixed time after the previous reinforcer.
    Cowie S; Elliffe D; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Sep; 100(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 23943395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Differential reinstatement predicted by preextinction response rate.
    Doughty AH; Reed P; Lattal KA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Dec; 11(6):1118-23. PubMed ID: 15875985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effects of ratio and interval schedules on the location variability of pecking responses in pigeons: Application of Bayesian statistical model.
    Kono M; Tanno T
    Behav Processes; 2020 Mar; 172():104059. PubMed ID: 31954811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The dynamics of conditioning and extinction.
    Killeen PR; Sanabria F; Dolgov I
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Oct; 35(4):447-72. PubMed ID: 19839699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.