These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12881169)

  • 1. The macrostructure of informal arguments: a proposed model and analysis.
    Ricco RB
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Aug; 56(6):1021-51. PubMed ID: 12881169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of argument structure on judgements of argument strength, function, and adequacy.
    Ricco RB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Apr; 61(4):641-64. PubMed ID: 18938280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The rationality of informal argumentation: a Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies.
    Hahn U; Oaksford M
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):704-32. PubMed ID: 17638503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling the effects of argument length and validity on inductive and deductive reasoning.
    Rotello CM; Heit E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1317-30. PubMed ID: 19686024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relations between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning.
    Heit E; Rotello CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):805-12. PubMed ID: 20438276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of contextual factors on the judgement of informal reasoning fallacies.
    Neuman Y; Weinstock MP; Glasner A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Feb; 59(2):411-25. PubMed ID: 16618643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating science arguments: evidence, uncertainty, and argument strength.
    Corner A; Hahn U
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Sep; 15(3):199-212. PubMed ID: 19751071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relevance framework for category-based induction: Evidence from garden-path arguments.
    Feeney A; Coley JD; Crisp A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):906-19. PubMed ID: 20565209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of arguments in research reports].
    Botes A
    Curationis; 1999 Jun; 22(2):10-9. PubMed ID: 11040614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of a reason's truth-value on the judgment of a fallacious argument.
    Neuman Y; Glassner A; Weinstock M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004 Jun; 116(2):173-84. PubMed ID: 15158181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of logical reasoning: children's ability to verbally explain the nature of the distinction between logical and nonlogical forms of argument.
    Morris AK
    Dev Psychol; 2000 Nov; 36(6):741-58. PubMed ID: 11081698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Logic, beliefs, and instruction: a test of the default interventionist account of belief bias.
    Handley SJ; Newstead SE; Trippas D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):28-43. PubMed ID: 21058879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Why is logic so likeable? A single-process account of argument evaluation with logic and liking judgments.
    Hayes BK; Wei P; Dunn JC; Stephens RG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(4):699-719. PubMed ID: 31343253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Logic and belief across the lifespan: the rise and fall of belief inhibition during syllogistic reasoning.
    De Neys W; Van Gelder E
    Dev Sci; 2009 Jan; 12(1):123-30. PubMed ID: 19120420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subclinical delusional ideation and a self-reference bias in everyday reasoning.
    Galbraith N; Manktelow K; Morris N
    Br J Psychol; 2008 Feb; 99(Pt 1):29-44. PubMed ID: 17535473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two kinds of reasoning.
    Rips LJ
    Psychol Sci; 2001 Mar; 12(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 11340921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Bayesian approach to the argument from ignorance.
    Oaksford M; Hahn U
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2004 Jun; 58(2):75-85. PubMed ID: 15285597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. FMRI evidence for a three-stage model of deductive reasoning.
    Fangmeier T; Knauff M; Ruff CC; Sloutsky V
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Mar; 18(3):320-34. PubMed ID: 16512999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Belief bias and figural bias in syllogistic reasoning.
    Morley NJ; Evans JS; Handley SJ
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 May; 57(4):666-92. PubMed ID: 15204128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The probability heuristics model of syllogistic reasoning.
    Chater N; Oaksford M
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Mar; 38(2):191-258. PubMed ID: 10090803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.