These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12881186)

  • 1. Hemifield memory for attractiveness.
    Deblieck C; Zaidel DW
    Int J Neurosci; 2003 Jul; 113(7):931-41. PubMed ID: 12881186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of perceptual quality on the processing of human faces presented to the left and right cerebral hemispheres.
    Hellige JB; Corwin WH; Jonsson JE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Feb; 10(1):90-107. PubMed ID: 6242766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gender differences in memory processing of female facial attractiveness: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Zhang Y; Wei B; Zhao P; Zheng M; Zhang L
    Neurocase; 2016 Jun; 22(3):317-23. PubMed ID: 26928269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attractive memory: High destination memory for attractive faces.
    El Haj M; Ndobo A
    Scand J Psychol; 2021 Feb; 62(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 32613619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. My left brain and me: a dissociation in the perception of self and others.
    Brady N; Campbell M; Flaherty M
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(9):1156-61. PubMed ID: 15178167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural correlates of the eye dominance effect in human face perception: the left-visual-field superiority for faces revisited.
    Jung W; Kang JG; Jeon H; Shim M; Sun Kim J; Leem HS; Lee SH
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 12(8):1342-1350. PubMed ID: 28379584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Emotional valence and arousal effects on memory and hemispheric asymmetries.
    Mneimne M; Powers AS; Walton KE; Kosson DS; Fonda S; Simonetti J
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Oct; 74(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 20579798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual differences and asymmetry effects in memory for unfamiliar faces.
    Hannay HJ; Rogers JP
    Cortex; 1979 Jun; 15(2):257-67. PubMed ID: 477341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in visual field advantage for facial recognition: the development of a general processing strategy.
    Turkewitz G; Ross P
    Cortex; 1983 Jun; 19(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 6884039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attractiveness, distinctiveness, and recognition of faces: attractive faces can be typical or distinctive but are not better recognized.
    Wickham LH; Morris PE
    Am J Psychol; 2003; 116(3):455-68. PubMed ID: 14503395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual differences in cerebral asymmetries for facial recognition.
    Ross P; Turkewitz G
    Cortex; 1981 Jul; 17(2):199-214. PubMed ID: 7285593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Origins of a stereotype: categorization of facial attractiveness by 6-month-old infants.
    Ramsey JL; Langlois JH; Hoss RA; Rubenstein AJ; Griffin AM
    Dev Sci; 2004 Apr; 7(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 15320380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Right cerebral hemisphere superiority for constructing facial representations.
    Young AW; Hay DC; McWeeny KH
    Neuropsychologia; 1985; 23(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 4000454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interhemispheric cooperation for face recognition but not for affective facial expressions.
    Schweinberger SR; Baird LM; Blümler M; Kaufmann JM; Mohr B
    Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(4):407-14. PubMed ID: 12559158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of attractiveness on face memory separated from distinctiveness: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Wiese H; Altmann CS; Schweinberger SR
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Apr; 56():26-36. PubMed ID: 24406982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. About face: left-hemisphere involvement in processing physiognomies.
    Sergent J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Feb; 8(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 6460075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reaction-time differences between the left and right hemispheres for face and letter discrimination in children and adults.
    Broman M
    Cortex; 1978 Dec; 14(4):578-91. PubMed ID: 738065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Familiarity decisions for faces presented to the left and right cerebral hemispheres.
    Young AW; Hay DC; McWeeny KH; Ellis AW; Barry C
    Brain Cogn; 1985 Oct; 4(4):439-50. PubMed ID: 4084403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Concentrating on beauty: sexual selection and sociospatial memory.
    Becker DV; Kenrick DT; Guerin S; Maner JK
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Dec; 31(12):1643-52. PubMed ID: 16254085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Different processes in attractiveness assessments for unattractive and highly attractive faces-The role of presentation duration and rotation.
    Stróżak P; Zielińska M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Sep; 200():102946. PubMed ID: 31693937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.