These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12881334)

  • 1. IOLMaster biometry: refractive results of 100 consecutive cases.
    Eleftheriadis H
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2003 Aug; 87(8):960-3. PubMed ID: 12881334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraocular lens power calculation using the IOLMaster and various formulas in eyes with long axial length.
    Wang JK; Hu CY; Chang SW
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):262-7. PubMed ID: 18242451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving refractive outcomes at extreme axial lengths with the IOLMaster: the optical axial length and keratometric transformation.
    Fam HB; Lim KL
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):678-83. PubMed ID: 19168467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the Zeiss IOLMaster and applanation A-scan ultrasound: biometry for intraocular lens calculation.
    Rose LT; Moshegov CN
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2003 Apr; 31(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 12648044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intraocular lens formula constant optimization and partial coherence interferometry biometry: Refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery.
    Aristodemou P; Knox Cartwright NE; Sparrow JM; Johnston RL
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Jan; 37(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 21183099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of predicted refraction with multifocal intraocular lenses using two biometry measurement devices and multiple intraocular lens power calculation formulas.
    Reitblat O; Assia EI; Kleinmann G; Levy A; Barrett GD; Abulafia A
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015; 43(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 25491591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Refractive Predictability Using the IOLMaster 700 and Artificial Intelligence-Based IOL Power Formulas Compared to Standard Formulas.
    Cheng H; Kane JX; Liu L; Li J; Cheng B; Wu M
    J Refract Surg; 2020 Jul; 36(7):466-472. PubMed ID: 32644169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of intraocular lens power prediction using immersion ultrasound and optical biometry with and without formula optimization.
    Nemeth G; Nagy A; Berta A; Modis L
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 250(9):1321-5. PubMed ID: 22527318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of the SRK/T formula using A-Scan ultrasound biometry after phacoemulsification in eyes with short and long axial lengths.
    Karabela Y; Eliacik M; Kaya F
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Jul; 16():96. PubMed ID: 27391470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation by the IOLMaster in phakic and eyes with hydrophobic acrylic lenses.
    Chang SW; Yu CY; Chen DP
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jul; 116(7):1336-42. PubMed ID: 19427697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation using three optical biometry measurement devices: the OA-2000, Lenstar-LS900 and IOLMaster-500.
    Reitblat O; Levy A; Kleinmann G; Assia EI
    Eye (Lond); 2018 Jul; 32(7):1244-1252. PubMed ID: 29527012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of ocular biometric factors on the accuracy of various IOL power calculation formulas.
    Jeong J; Song H; Lee JK; Chuck RS; Kwon JW
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 May; 17(1):62. PubMed ID: 28464806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations.
    Rajan MS; Keilhorn I; Bell JA
    Eye (Lond); 2002 Sep; 16(5):552-6. PubMed ID: 12194067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of the refractive prediction determined by multiple currently available intraocular lens power calculation formulas in small eyes.
    Carifi G; Aiello F; Zygoura V; Kopsachilis N; Maurino V
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 159(3):577-83. PubMed ID: 25524494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of refractive outcomes using Scheimpflug Holladay equivalent keratometry or IOLMaster 700 keratometry for IOL power calculation.
    Aksoy M; Asena L; Güngör SG; Küçüködük A; Akman A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2021 Jun; 41(6):2205-2212. PubMed ID: 33733281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of IOL power calculation and refractive outcome after laser refractive cataract surgery with a femtosecond laser versus conventional phacoemulsification.
    Filkorn T; Kovács I; Takács A; Horváth E; Knorz MC; Nagy ZZ
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Aug; 28(8):540-4. PubMed ID: 22785062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the biometric formulas used for applanation A-scan ultrasound biometry.
    Özcura F; Aktaş S; Sağdık HM; Tetikoğlu M
    Int Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 36(5):707-12. PubMed ID: 26854320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Refractive outcome of cataract surgery using partial coherence interferometry and ultrasound biometry: clinical feasibility study of a commercial prototype II.
    Kiss B; Findl O; Menapace R; Wirtitsch M; Petternel V; Drexler W; Rainer G; Georgopoulos M; Hitzenberger CK; Fercher AF
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Feb; 28(2):230-4. PubMed ID: 11821201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas using a swept-source optical biometer.
    Kim SY; Lee SH; Kim NR; Chin HS; Jung JW
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227638. PubMed ID: 31935241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Refractive predictability using two optical biometers and refraction types for intraocular lens power calculation in cataract surgery.
    Cheng H; Li J; Cheng B; Wu M
    Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jul; 40(7):1849-1856. PubMed ID: 32297050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.