286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12881539)
1. Intellectual property. Depth charges aimed at Columbia's 'submarine patent'.
Marshall E
Science; 2003 Jul; 301(5632):448. PubMed ID: 12881539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Biotechs sue Columbia over fourth Axel patent.
Howard K
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):955-6. PubMed ID: 12949538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Charges fly in $1bn hormone patent battle.
Dalton R
Nature; 1999 May; 399(6734):289. PubMed ID: 10360558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Intellectual property. Judge turns Rochester's golden patent into lead.
Malakoff D
Science; 2003 Mar; 299(5613):1638-9. PubMed ID: 12637705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ownership at too high a price?
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):953. PubMed ID: 12949537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Intellectual property. NIH roils academe with advice on licensing DNA patents.
Malakoff D
Science; 2004 Mar; 303(5665):1757-8. PubMed ID: 15031474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Intellectual property. Universities ask Supreme Court to reverse patent ruling.
Malakoff D
Science; 2003 Jan; 299(5603):26-7. PubMed ID: 12511618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Intellectual property. Academia gets no help from U.S. in patent case.
Malakoff D
Science; 2003 Jun; 300(5626):1635-7. PubMed ID: 12805507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostics firms face new patent claim worries.
Allison M
Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Jul; 27(7):586-7. PubMed ID: 19587651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Science and the law. Working through the patent problem.
Walsh JP; Cohen WM; Arora A
Science; 2003 Feb; 299(5609):1021. PubMed ID: 12586928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Bayh-Dole: if we knew then what we know now.
Boettiger S; Bennett AB
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Mar; 24(3):320-3. PubMed ID: 16525405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Intellectual property. Decision on NFkappaB patent could have broad implications for biotech.
Garber K
Science; 2006 May; 312(5775):827. PubMed ID: 16690824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Intellectual property. Court tightens patent rules on gene tags.
Kintisch E
Science; 2005 Sep; 309(5742):1797-9. PubMed ID: 16166482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. US jury split over hormone patent case..
Dalton R
Nature; 1999 Jun; 399(6736):512. PubMed ID: 10376586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Patents. Signature on visitor's form fuels Stanford v. Roche court battle.
Marshall E
Science; 2011 Apr; 332(6026):163. PubMed ID: 21474725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. U.S. intellectual property law. Government questions sequencing patent.
Kintisch E
Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5803):1230. PubMed ID: 17124298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Patenting pluripotence: the next battle for stem cell intellectual property.
Vrtovec KT; Scott CT
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Apr; 26(4):393-5. PubMed ID: 18392018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intellectual property protection for plant-related inventions in Europe.
Fleck B; Baldock C
Nat Rev Genet; 2003 Oct; 4(10):834-8. PubMed ID: 14526379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Affymetrix in new patents row.
Ledford H
Nature; 2008 Jul; 454(7203):377. PubMed ID: 18650873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Research interactions between industry and academia: a corporate perspective.
Citron P
Physiologist; 1996 Jun; 39(3):81, 90-2. PubMed ID: 16764116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
