147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12881679)
1. [Measurement of half-value layer in mammography].
Yagi H; Kitamura R; Saruwatari R; Doi N; Yamane E
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Jun; 59(6):729-36. PubMed ID: 12881679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Precision of half-value layer measurement on mammography].
Ishii R; Yoshida A; Ishii M; Fujimoto S; Henmi N
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(12):1533-9. PubMed ID: 22186198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of spectra on calibration and measurement with mammographic ionization chambers.
DeWerd LA; Micka JA; Laird RW; Pearson DW; O'Brien M; Lamperti P
Med Phys; 2002 Nov; 29(11):2649-54. PubMed ID: 12462732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Solid-state dosimeters: a new approach for mammography measurements.
Brateman LF; Heintz PH
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):542-57. PubMed ID: 25652475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Getting started with protocol for quality assurance of digital mammography in the clinical centre of Montenegro.
Ivanovic S; Bosmans H; Mijovic S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):363-8. PubMed ID: 25862535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Average glandular dose in routine mammography screening using a Sectra MicroDose Mammography unit.
Hemdal B; Herrnsdorf L; Andersson I; Bengtsson G; Heddson B; Olsson M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):436-43. PubMed ID: 15933152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A fast non-invasive beam check for mammography x-ray units.
Gambaccini M; Marziani M; Rimondi O
Phys Med Biol; 1994 Sep; 39(9):1423-35. PubMed ID: 15552114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Problems of the effective energy used as a quality expression of diagnostic X-ray].
Kato H; Hayashi N; Suzuki S; Ando S; Miyamoto M; Wakasugi N; Suzuki S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(10):1320-6. PubMed ID: 22026986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of HVL measurements utilizing solid state detectors for radiography and fluoroscopy X-ray systems.
Lin PP; Goode AR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 22(9):339-344. PubMed ID: 34375033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ambient dose equivalent and effective dose from scattered x-ray spectra in mammography for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations.
Künzel R; Herdade SB; Costa PR; Terini RA; Levenhagen RS
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(8):2077-91. PubMed ID: 16585846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of semiconductor dosimeters with a range of radiation qualities used for mammography: A calibration laboratory study.
Salomon E; Homolka P; Csete I; Toroi P
Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1372-1378. PubMed ID: 31889315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of a compression paddle on energy response, calibration and measurement with mammographic dosimeters using ionization chambers and solid-state detectors.
Hourdakis CJ; Boziari A; Koumbouli E
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(4):1047-59. PubMed ID: 19168939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A special ionisation chamber for quality control of diagnostic and mammography X ray equipment.
Costa AM; Caldas LV
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 104(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 12862242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Measurement of Average Glandular Dose Using Multiparameter X-ray Measuring Instrument].
Kobayashi T; Koyama T; Terada M; Negishi T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2023 Nov; 79(11):1266-1273. PubMed ID: 37778978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Half-value layer and intensity variations as a function of position in the radiation field for film-screen mammography.
Terry JA; Waggener RG; Miller Blough MA
Med Phys; 1999 Feb; 26(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 10076984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system.
Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Dance DR
Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of effective energy for QA and QC: measurement of half-value layer using radiochromic film density.
Gotanda T; Katsuda T; Gotanda R; Tabuchi A; Yamamoto K; Kuwano T; Yatake H; Takeda Y
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2009 Mar; 32(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 19400550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A survey on performance status of mammography machines: image quality and dosimetry studies using a standard mammography imaging phantom.
Sharma R; Sharma SD; Mayya YS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jul; 150(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 22090414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A simple method for evaluation of half-value layer variation in CT equipment.
Maia AF; Caldas LV
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1595-601. PubMed ID: 16510965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Further factors for the estimation of mean glandular dose using the United Kingdom, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols.
Dance DR; Young KC; van Engen RE
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(14):4361-72. PubMed ID: 19550001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
