152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12881688)
1. [Image quality and radiation exposure in mass mammography examinations: a report from the Survey Group for Institutional Evaluation].
Suzuki R; Horita K; Asahara M; Koyama S; Sanada S; Terada H; Nishitani M; Ishikawa M; Wakamaru A; Kurowarabi K; Negishi T;
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 May; 59(5):604-16. PubMed ID: 12881688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital mammography: clinical image evaluation.
Bassett LW; Hoyt AC; Oshiro T
Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):903-15. PubMed ID: 20868893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital mammography for screening and diagnosis of breast cancer: an overview.
Van Ongeval Ch
JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 17696081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital mammography imaging: breast tomosynthesis and advanced applications.
Helvie MA
Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):917-29. PubMed ID: 20868894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Photon-counting digital mammography: evaluation of performance under clinically relevant conditions.
Karellas A
Acad Radiol; 2012 Aug; 19(8):913-5. PubMed ID: 22770464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital mammography: novel applications.
Rafferty EA
Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):831-43, vii. PubMed ID: 17888772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.
Vedantham S; Karellas A; Vijayaraghavan GR; Kopans DB
Radiology; 2015 Dec; 277(3):663-84. PubMed ID: 26599926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Image quality, threshold contrast and mean glandular dose in CR mammography.
Jakubiak RR; Gamba HR; Neves EB; Peixoto JE
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6565-83. PubMed ID: 24002695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital Compared with Screen-Film Mammography: Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy among Women Screened in the Ontario Breast Screening Program--Evidence that Direct Radiography Is Superior to Computed Radiography for Cancer Detection.
Pisano ED
Radiology; 2016 Feb; 278(2):311-2. PubMed ID: 26789598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital versus screen-film mammography: a retrospective comparison in a population-based screening program.
Heddson B; Rönnow K; Olsson M; Miller D
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 64(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 17383841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Digital breast tomosynthesis].
Gomi S; Uchiyama S; Otsuka K; Ishikawa M; Gomi T; Moriyama N
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(6):757-66. PubMed ID: 22805453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Autoradiographic enhancement of mammograms. Investigation of a new dose reduction technique.
Askins BS; Brill AB; Rao GU; Novak GR
Radiology; 1979 Jan; 130(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 758636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Current status of screening digital mammography in Japan].
Yamada T; Suzuki A
Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():318-23. PubMed ID: 17679206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging With Synthesized 2D Mammography: Differences, Advantages, and Pitfalls Compared With Digital Mammography.
Zuckerman SP; Maidment ADA; Weinstein SP; McDonald ES; Conant EF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jul; 209(1):222-229. PubMed ID: 28463546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital Imaging of the Breast: Is a Synthetic View Better?
Jenks S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2016 Apr; 108(4):. PubMed ID: 27038116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Variable Appearances of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Calcifications on Digital Mammography, Synthesized Mammography, and Tomosynthesis: A Pictorial Essay.
Hwang E; Szabo J; Sonnenblick EB; Margolies LR
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2018 Feb; 69(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 28947267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Digital image processing of screening mammographies: application to masses].
Viton JL; Seradour B; Rasigni M
J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 79(4):319-22. PubMed ID: 9757256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast tomosynthesis: Dosimetry and image quality assessment on phantom.
Meyblum E; Gardavaud F; Dao TH; Fournier V; Beaussart P; Pigneur F; Baranes L; Rahmouni A; Luciani A
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2015 Sep; 96(9):931-9. PubMed ID: 25908324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. APPLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN PROTOCOL IN THE EVALUATION OF DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY UNITS WITH TUNGSTEN TARGET TUBES.
Borg M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(4):507-518. PubMed ID: 30986308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital mammography.
Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
Radiographics; 1998; 18(4):893-901. PubMed ID: 9672974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
