258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12881924)
41. [Role of rectal exploration, suprapubic and transrectal prostatic ultrasonography, and PSA in the diagnosis and follow-up of prostatic carcinoma].
Speranza I; Bianco V; Banci M; Muià R; Gianni W; Bacciu O; Vecchione A; Marchei P
Minerva Med; 1998; 89(7-8):267-75. PubMed ID: 9824988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Prostate specific antigen and local recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Lightner DJ; Lange PH; Reddy PK; Moore L
J Urol; 1990 Oct; 144(4):921-6. PubMed ID: 1697917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. How to explore the patient with a rising PSA after radical prostatectomy: defining local versus systemic failure.
Jhaveri FM; Klein EA
Semin Urol Oncol; 1999 Aug; 17(3):130-4. PubMed ID: 10462315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Transrectal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of prostatic cancer].
Engert Z; Végh A
Orv Hetil; 1995 Jan; 136(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 7532846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Can perineural invasion on prostate needle biopsy predict prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy?
de la Taille A; Rubin MA; Bagiella E; Olsson CA; Buttyan R; Burchardt T; Knight C; O'Toole KM; Katz AE
J Urol; 1999 Jul; 162(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 10379750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Prostate cancer detection at low prostate specific antigen.
Schröder FH; van der Cruijsen-Koeter I; de Koning HJ; Vis AN; Hoedemaeker RF; Kranse R
J Urol; 2000 Mar; 163(3):806-12. PubMed ID: 10687982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Digital rectal examination and imaging studies are unnecessary in men with undetectable prostate specific antigen following radical prostatectomy.
Pound CR; Christens-Barry OW; Gurganus RT; Partin AW; Walsh PC
J Urol; 1999 Oct; 162(4):1337-40. PubMed ID: 10492192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Prostate cancer: correlation of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound and prostate specific antigen levels with tumor volumes in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Palken M; Cobb OE; Warren BH; Hoak DC
J Urol; 1990 Jun; 143(6):1155-62. PubMed ID: 1692886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Outcomes of transrectal ultrasound scan of the prostate with sector biopsies for 323 New Zealand men with suspicion of prostate cancer.
Smart R
N Z Med J; 1999 Dec; 112(1101):465-9. PubMed ID: 10678211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparative sensitivities of functional MRI sequences in detection of local recurrence of prostate carcinoma after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiotherapy.
Roy C; Foudi F; Charton J; Jung M; Lang H; Saussine C; Jacqmin D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Apr; 200(4):W361-8. PubMed ID: 23521479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [The treatment of locally advanced (T3) prostatic carcinoma using radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy. A review].
van den Ouden D; Schröder FH
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr; 1998 Apr; 29(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 9615377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Is routine digital rectal examination required for the followup of prostate cancer?
Warren KS; McFarlane JP
J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 17499293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Local recurrence after retropubic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer does not exclusively occur at the anastomotic site.
Nguyen DP; Giannarini G; Seiler R; Schiller R; Thoeny HC; Thalmann GN; Studer UE
BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(4):E243-9. PubMed ID: 23186331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Preoperative prediction of pathological tumor volume and stage in clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.
McSherry SA; Levy F; Schiebler ML; Keefe B; Dent GA; Mohler JL
J Urol; 1991 Jul; 146(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 1711590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Comparison of rectal examination, transrectal echography, CAT and MRI in the local staging of prostatic carcinoma].
Montorsi F; Guazzoni G; Consonni P; Colombo R; Nava L; Bergamaschi F; Scattoni V; Rigatti P
Arch Ital Urol Nefrol Androl; 1991 Jun; 63 Suppl 2():143-5. PubMed ID: 1836654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Radical prostatectomy as treatment of localized prostatic cancer. Early results, with special focus on transrectal ultrasound for local staging.
Rannikko S; Salo JO
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 1990; 24(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 2192443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Digital rectal examination is no longer necessary in the routine follow-up of men with undetectable prostate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy: the implications for follow-up.
Chaplin BJ; Wildhagen MF; Schroder FH; Kirkels WJ; Bangma CH
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):906-10. PubMed ID: 16126322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Salvage radical prostatectomy: outcome measured by serum prostate specific antigen levels.
Rogers E; Ohori M; Kassabian VS; Wheeler TM; Scardino PT
J Urol; 1995 Jan; 153(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 7526002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Sonographic characteristics of the urethrovesical anastomosis in the early post-radical prostatectomy patient.
Goldenberg SL; Carter M; Dashefsky S; Cooperberg PL
J Urol; 1992 May; 147(5):1307-9. PubMed ID: 1569673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Accuracy of predicting long-term prostate specific antigen outcome based on early prostate specific antigen recurrence results after radical prostatectomy.
Soergel TM; Koch MO; Foster RS; Bihrle R; Wahle G; Gardner T; Jung SH
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2198-201. PubMed ID: 11696735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
