203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12882773)
1. Repeatability of ETDRS visual acuity in children.
Manny RE; Hussein M; Gwiazda J; Marsh-Tootle W;
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Aug; 44(8):3294-300. PubMed ID: 12882773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Normative monocular visual acuity for early treatment diabetic retinopathy study charts in emmetropic children 5 to 12 years of age.
Dobson V; Clifford-Donaldson CE; Green TK; Miller JM; Harvey EM
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jul; 116(7):1397-401. PubMed ID: 19427702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Refractive error and visual acuity changes in orthokeratology patients.
Cheung SW; Cho P; Chui WS; Woo GC
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):410-6. PubMed ID: 17502824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Repeatability of ETDRS visual acuity measurement in children].
Lin Z; Wu C; Chen X; He M
Yan Ke Xue Bao; 2008 Mar; 24(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 18709958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeatability of Monocular Acuity Testing in Adults with and without Down Syndrome.
Ravikumar A; Benoit JS; Morrison KB; Marsack JD; Anderson HA
Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Mar; 95(3):202-211. PubMed ID: 29461409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Repeatability of mesopic visual acuity measurements using high- and low-contrast ETDRS letter charts.
Barrio A; Antona B; Puell MC
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 May; 253(5):791-5. PubMed ID: 25488572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of simulated refractive error on adult visual acuity for paediatric tests.
Paudel N; Jacobs RJ; Sloan R; Denny S; Shea K; Thompson B; Anstice N
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):521-530. PubMed ID: 28656671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of Lea Symbol vs ETDRS letter distance visual acuity in a population of young children with a high prevalence of astigmatism.
Dobson V; Clifford-Donaldson CE; Miller JM; Garvey KA; Harvey EM
J AAPOS; 2009 Jun; 13(3):253-7. PubMed ID: 19345596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of visual acuity in macular degeneration patients measured with snellen and early treatment diabetic retinopathy study charts.
Falkenstein IA; Cochran DE; Azen SP; Dustin L; Tammewar AM; Kozak I; Freeman WR
Ophthalmology; 2008 Feb; 115(2):319-23. PubMed ID: 17706288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of blur and subsequent adaptation on visual acuity using letter and Landolt C charts: differences between emmetropes and myopes.
Poulere E; Moschandreas J; Kontadakis GA; Pallikaris IG; Plainis S
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar; 33(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 23297779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective evaluation of visual acuity assessment: a comparison of snellen versus ETDRS charts in clinical practice (An AOS Thesis).
Kaiser PK
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2009 Dec; 107():311-24. PubMed ID: 20126505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Visual acuity and the causes of visual loss in a population-based sample of 6-year-old Australian children.
Robaei D; Rose K; Ojaimi E; Kifley A; Huynh S; Mitchell P
Ophthalmology; 2005 Jul; 112(7):1275-82. PubMed ID: 15921756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An evaluation of the M&S technologies smart system II for visual acuity measurement in young visually-normal adults.
McClenaghan N; Kimura A; Stark LR
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 84(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 17435535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and Validation of a Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test (Peek Acuity) for Clinical Practice and Community-Based Fieldwork.
Bastawrous A; Rono HK; Livingstone IA; Weiss HA; Jordan S; Kuper H; Burton MJ
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 133(8):930-7. PubMed ID: 26022921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visual Acuity Testing Using a Random Method Visual Acuity Application.
Rhiu S; Lee HJ; Goo YS; Cho K; Kim JH
Telemed J E Health; 2016 Mar; 22(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 26280910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening for myopia and refractive errors using LogMAR visual acuity by optometrists and a simplified visual acuity chart by nurses.
Tong L; Saw SM; Chan ES; Yap M; Lee HY; Kwang YP; Tan D
Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 81(9):684-91. PubMed ID: 15365388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do picture-based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children.
Anstice NS; Jacobs RJ; Simkin SK; Thomson M; Thompson B; Collins AV
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0170839. PubMed ID: 28152076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol in children 7 to <13 years old.
Cotter SA; Chu RH; Chandler DL; Beck RW; Holmes JM; Rice ML; Hertle RW; Birch EE; Moke PS
Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Oct; 136(4):655-61. PubMed ID: 14516805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The repeatability of best corrected acuity in normal and amblyopic children 4 to 12 years of age.
Chen SI; Chandna A; Norcia AM; Pettet M; Stone D
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 47(2):614-9. PubMed ID: 16431958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Repeatability of the Waterloo Four-Contrast LogMAR Visual Acuity chart and Near Vision Test card on a group of normal young adults.
Cho P; Woo GC
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Sep; 24(5):427-35. PubMed ID: 15315657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
