1053 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12883825)
1. Maternal and neonatal morbidity of emergency caesarean sections with a decision-to-delivery interval under 30 minutes: evidence from 10 years.
Hillemanns P; Hasbargen U; Strauss A; Schulze A; Genzel-Boroviczeny O; Hepp H
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2003 Aug; 268(3):136-41. PubMed ID: 12883825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Crash emergency cesarean section: decision-to-delivery interval under 30 min and its effect on Apgar and umbilical artery pH.
Hillemanns P; Strauss A; Hasbargen U; Schulze A; Genzel-Boroviczeny O; Weninger E; Hepp H
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Dec; 273(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 16044190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes.
Bloom SL; Leveno KJ; Spong CY; Gilbert S; Hauth JC; Landon MB; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; O'sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Gabbe SG;
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jul; 108(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 16816049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Emergency cesarean section--organization and decision-delivery time].
Hillemanns P; Hepp H; Rebhan H; Knitza R
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1996 Aug; 56(8):423-30. PubMed ID: 8974897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The 30-minute decision-to-incision interval for emergency cesarean delivery: fact or fiction?
Nasrallah FK; Harirah HM; Vadhera R; Jain V; Franklin LT; Hankins GD
Am J Perinatol; 2004 Feb; 21(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 15017468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the decision--to--delivery interval in emergency caesarean sections.
Sayegh I; Dupuis O; Clement HJ; Rudigoz RC
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Sep; 116(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 15294363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cesarean delivery in Finland: maternal complications and obstetric risk factors.
Pallasmaa N; Ekblad U; Aitokallio-Tallberg A; Uotila J; Raudaskoski T; Ulander VM; Hurme S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Jul; 89(7):896-902. PubMed ID: 20583935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Decision - delivery interval and perinatal outcome in emergency caesarean sections.
Onah HE; Ibeziako N; Umezulike AC; Effetie ER; Ogbuokiri CM
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 May; 25(4):342-6. PubMed ID: 16091313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of labor at term on measures of neonatal outcome.
Richardson BS; Czikk MJ; daSilva O; Natale R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jan; 192(1):219-26. PubMed ID: 15672028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Placenta praevia: maternal morbidity and place of birth.
Olive EC; Roberts CL; Algert CS; Morris JM
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Dec; 45(6):499-504. PubMed ID: 16401216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating the thirty minute interval in emergency cesarean sections.
Schauberger CW; Rooney BL; Beguin EA; Schaper AM; Spindler J
J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Aug; 179(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 8044383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maternal and infant outcome after caesarean section without recorded medical indication: findings from a Swedish case-control study.
Karlström A; Lindgren H; Hildingsson I
BJOG; 2013 Mar; 120(4):479-86; discussion 486. PubMed ID: 23316937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Urgency of surgery and presence of maternal disease influence the choice of anaesthesia for Caesarean section at LUTH.
Desalu I; Afolabi BB
Niger Postgrad Med J; 2007 Jun; 14(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 17599107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Emergency obstetric hysterectomy in a university hospital: A 25-year review.
Rahman J; Al-Ali M; Qutub HO; Al-Suleiman SS; Al-Jama FE; Rahman MS
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Jan; 28(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 18259903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes by mode of delivery. A case-controlled study.
Benedetto C; Marozio L; Prandi G; Roccia A; Blefari S; Fabris C
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Nov; 135(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 17126475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor.
Alexander JM; Leveno KJ; Rouse DJ; Landon MB; Gilbert S; Spong CY; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Gabbe SG;
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):917-21. PubMed ID: 17400854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Absence of conception after caesarean section: voluntary or involuntary?
Bhattacharya S; Porter M; Harrild K; Naji A; Mollison J; van Teijlingen E; Campbell DM; Hall MH; Templeton A
BJOG; 2006 Mar; 113(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 16487197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Emergency Cesarean section--analysis of 143 emergency sections].
Beck CT; Klingemann H; Dallacker W; Dräger B
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1992 Feb; 52(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 1568639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancy according to the planned mode of delivery.
Schmitz T; Carnavalet Cde C; Azria E; Lopez E; Cabrol D; Goffinet F
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 111(3):695-703. PubMed ID: 18310373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What is a reasonable time from decision-to-delivery by caesarean section? Evidence from 415 deliveries.
MacKenzie IZ; Cooke I
BJOG; 2002 May; 109(5):498-504. PubMed ID: 12066937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
