These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12884677)

  • 1. Backward conditioning: mediation by the context.
    Chang RC; Blaisdell AP; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Jul; 29(3):171-83. PubMed ID: 12884677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing excitatory backward and forward conditioning.
    Chang RC; Stout S; Miller RR
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Jan; 57(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 14690847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Backward blocking in first-order conditioning.
    Urushihara K; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Apr; 36(2):281-95. PubMed ID: 20384407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Degraded contingency revisited: posttraining extinction of a cover stimulus attenuates a target cue's behavioral control.
    Witnauer JE; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Oct; 33(4):440-50. PubMed ID: 17924791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trial spacing is a determinant of cue interaction.
    Stout SC; Chang R; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Jan; 29(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 12561131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some determinants of second-order conditioning.
    Witnauer JE; Miller RR
    Learn Behav; 2011 Mar; 39(1):12-26. PubMed ID: 21264564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcome-specific conditioned inhibition in Pavlovian backward conditioning.
    Delamater AR; LoLordo VM; Sosa W
    Learn Behav; 2003 Nov; 31(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 14733487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Second-order excitation mediated by a backward conditioned inhibitor.
    Barnet RC; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1996 Jul; 22(3):279-96. PubMed ID: 8691159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Associative status of the training context determines the effectiveness of compound extinction.
    Witnauer JE; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Jan; 38(1):52-65. PubMed ID: 22229586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Overshadowing of subsequent events and recovery thereafter.
    Burger DC; Mallemat H; Miller RR
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 May; 53(2):149-71. PubMed ID: 10881606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The comparator hypothesis of conditioned response generation: manifest conditioned excitation and inhibition as a function of relative excitatory strengths of CS and conditioning context at the time of testing.
    Kasprow WJ; Schachtman TR; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1987 Oct; 13(4):395-406. PubMed ID: 3668477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proactive interference between cues trained with a common outcome in first-order Pavlovian conditioning.
    Amundson JC; Escobar M; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Oct; 29(4):311-22. PubMed ID: 14570518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of relative stimulus validity: learning or performance deficit?
    Cole RP; Barnet RC; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1995 Oct; 21(4):293-303. PubMed ID: 7595237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inhibition and mediated activation between conditioned stimuli: Parallels between perceptual learning and associative conditioning.
    Polack CW; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(2):194-208. PubMed ID: 29683697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prevention of the degraded-contingency effect by signalling training trials.
    Gunther LM; Miller RR
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 May; 53(2):97-119. PubMed ID: 10881603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Proactive interference by cues presented without outcomes: Differences in context specificity of latent inhibition and conditioned inhibition.
    Miguez G; McConnell B; Polack CW; Miller RR
    Learn Behav; 2018 Sep; 46(3):265-280. PubMed ID: 29313238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Blocking is not 'pure' cue competition: Renewal-like effects in forward and backward blocking indicate contributions by associative cue interference.
    Miguez G; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2022 Apr; 48(2):145-159. PubMed ID: 35225640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recovery from blocking between outcomes.
    Wheeler DS; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 16248732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrasting reduced overshadowing and blocking.
    Wheeler DS; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Jul; 33(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 17620032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protection from extinction provided by a conditioned inhibitor.
    McConnell BL; Miller RR
    Learn Behav; 2010 Feb; 38(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 20065350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.