These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12885282)

  • 1. Mobile telephone use among Melbourne drivers: a preventable exposure to injury risk.
    Taylor DM; Bennett DM; Carter M; Garewal D
    Med J Aust; 2003 Aug; 179(3):140-2. PubMed ID: 12885282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Handheld mobile telephone use among Melbourne drivers.
    Taylor DM; MacBean CE; Das A; Mohd Rosli R
    Med J Aust; 2007 Oct; 187(8):432-4. PubMed ID: 17937638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Seat belt and mobile phone use among vehicle drivers in the city of Doha, Qatar: an observational study.
    Mahfoud ZR; Cheema S; Alrouh H; Al-Thani MH; Al-Thani AA; Mamtani R
    BMC Public Health; 2015 Sep; 15():937. PubMed ID: 26392362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phone use and crashes while driving: A representative survey of drivers in two Australian states.
    McEvoy SP; Stevenson MR; Woodward M
    Med J Aust; 2006 Dec 4-18; 185(11-12):630-4. PubMed ID: 17181509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Longer term effects of New York State's law on drivers' handheld cell phone use.
    McCartt AT; Geary LL
    Inj Prev; 2004 Feb; 10(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 14760020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mobile telephone use among Melbourne drivers: a preventable exposure to injury risk.
    Bouvier R
    Med J Aust; 2004 Jan; 180(1):43. PubMed ID: 14743523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trends in the use of seat belts and mobile phones and their seasonal variations in Florence (2005-2015).
    Lorini C; Bianchi J; Sartor G; Santini MG; Mersi A; Caini S; Bonaccorsi G
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208489. PubMed ID: 30533029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Taking the right course: The possibilities and challenges of offering alternatives to prosecution for drivers detected using mobile phones while driving.
    Savigar-Shaw L; Wells H; Briggs G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Aug; 173():106710. PubMed ID: 35588589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The prevalence of seatbelt and mobile phone use among drivers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: An observational study.
    Alghnam S; Alrowaily M; Alkelya M; Alsaif A; Almoaiqel F; Aldegheishem A
    J Safety Res; 2018 Sep; 66():33-37. PubMed ID: 30121109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hand-held cell phone use while driving legislation and observed driver behavior among population sub-groups in the United States.
    Rudisill TM; Zhu M
    BMC Public Health; 2017 May; 17(1):437. PubMed ID: 28499425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Comparative Study of Accident Risk Related to Speech-Based and Handheld Texting during a Sudden Braking Event in Urban Road Environments.
    Fu R; Chen Y; Xu Q; Guo Y; Yuan W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Aug; 17(16):. PubMed ID: 32781529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. National reported patterns of driver cell phone use in the United States.
    Braitman KA; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2010 Dec; 11(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 21128181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of road infrastructure and traffic complexity in speed adaptation behaviour of distracted drivers.
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Haque MM; King M; Washington S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Apr; 101():67-77. PubMed ID: 28189943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The association between handheld phone bans and the prevalence of handheld phone conversations among young drivers in the United States.
    Zhu M; Rudisill TM; Heeringa S; Swedler D; Redelmeier DA
    Ann Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):833-837.e1. PubMed ID: 27894566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Prevalence of mobile phone use among drivers: direct observation in Udine (Northern Italy)].
    Valent F; Del Pin M; Mattiussi E; Palese A;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2020; 44(2-3):171-178. PubMed ID: 32631017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mobile telephone use among Melbourne drivers: a preventable exposure to injury risk.
    McEvoy SP; Stevenson MR
    Med J Aust; 2004 Jan; 180(1):43; author reply 44-5. PubMed ID: 14709129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Prevalence of mobile phone use while driving vehicles].
    Astrain I; Bernaus J; Claverol J; Escobar A; Godoy P
    Gac Sanit; 2003; 17(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 12605748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association between mobile phone traffic volume and road crash fatalities: A population-based case-crossover study.
    Gariazzo C; Stafoggia M; Bruzzone S; Pelliccioni A; Forastiere F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():25-33. PubMed ID: 29544134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A parametric duration model of the reaction times of drivers distracted by mobile phone conversations.
    Haque MM; Washington S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():42-53. PubMed ID: 24129320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mobile phones and driving.
    Johal S; Napier F; Britt-Compton J; Marshall T
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2005 Mar; 27(1):112-3. PubMed ID: 15637105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.