118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12885366)
21. [Comparative study of the effect of intravaginal misoprostol at 50 and 100 micrograms in cervical ripening and labor induction].
Reyna-Villasmil E; Guerra-Velásquez M; Torres-Montilla M; Reyna-Villasmil N; Mejia-Montilla J; Labarca-Vincero N
Invest Clin; 2005 Jun; 46(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 16001749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol to intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with favorable cervical examinations.
Wing DA; Fassett MJ; Guberman C; Tran S; Parrish A; Guinn D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1689-94; discussion 1694-6. PubMed ID: 15284771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Induction of labor with misoprostol in pregnancies with advanced maternal age.
Zeteroglu S; Sahin GH; Sahin HA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Dec; 129(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 16406221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
Dalui R; Suri V; Ray P; Gupta I
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 15762966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Vaginal misoprostol in managing premature rupture of membranes.
Ayad IA
East Mediterr Health J; 2002; 8(4-5):515-20. PubMed ID: 15603033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Induction of labor with prostaglandin E2 vaginal suppositories.
Macer J; Buchanan D; Yonekura ML
Obstet Gynecol; 1984 May; 63(5):664-8. PubMed ID: 6585734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparing two dinoprostone agents for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized trial.
Marconi AM; Bozzetti P; Morabito A; Pardi G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Jun; 138(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 17889983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Comparing two Prepidil gel regimens for cervical ripening before induction of labor at term: a randomized trial].
Fekih M; Ben Zina N; Jnifen A; Nouri S; Ben Regaya L; Memmi A; Bouguizene S; Chaieb A; Bibi M; Sboui H; Khairi H
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2009 Jun; 38(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 19467806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A prospective randomized study comparing misoprostol and oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term.
Zeteroğlu S; Engin-Ustün Y; Ustün Y; Güvercinçi M; Sahin G; Kamaci M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 May; 19(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 16753768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Induction of labor in patients with premature rupture of membranes in term pregnancy using dinoprostone vs oxytocin. An aleatory study].
Domínguez Salgado CR; Gorostieta García A; Vázquez Bretón S
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1999 Oct; 67():461-6. PubMed ID: 10582392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of Dinoprostone slow release pessary (Propess) with gel (Prostin) for induction of labour at term-a randomised trial.
Kalkat RK; McMillan E; Cooper H; Palmer K
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 28(7):695-9. PubMed ID: 19065363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [An open evaluation of prolonged-release dinoprostone with a retrieval system (a formulation of 1.1 MM) in unfavorable cervical ripening in the induction of labor for medical and obstetrical indications].
Moreno García JD; Márquez Becerra MA; Reyes Compain Ydel C; Juárez Azpilcueta AA
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1999 Jul; 67():302-7. PubMed ID: 10496051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dinoprostone vaginal slow-release system (Propess) compared to expectant management in the active treatment of premature rupture of the membranes at term: impact on maternal and fetal outcomes.
Larrañaga-Azcárate C; Campo-Molina G; Pérez-Rodríguez AF; Ezcurdia-Gurpegui M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 18231888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prepidil compared to Propess for cervical ripening.
Vollebregt A; van't Hof DB; Exalto N
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2002 Sep; 104(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 12206922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Is propess a better method of induction of labour in nulliparous women.
Mukhopadhyay M; Lim KJ; Fairlie FM
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 May; 22(3):294-5. PubMed ID: 12521503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Current practice and results of labor induction].
Csorba R; Aranyosi J; Juhász G; Zatik J; Major T
Orv Hetil; 2003 Oct; 144(40):1977-80. PubMed ID: 14626639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Unsucessful labour induction in women with unfavourable cervical scores: predictors and management.
Caliskan E; Dilbaz S; Gelisen O; Dilbaz B; Ozturk N; Haberal A
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 15598298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The influence of dinoprostone on uterine cervix ripening and the course of labor.
Wielgos M; Szymusik I; Kosinska-Kaczynska K; Suchonska B; Kaminski P; Banaszek-Wysoczanska A; Bomba-Opon D; Szpotanska M
Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2007 Aug; 28(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 17693987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical significances of Bishop score and vaginal bleeding to controlled-release dinoprostone delivery system (PROPESS) efficacy for cervical ripening: A retrospective single-center study in Japan.
Imai K; Aoki C; Tano S; Iitani Y; Nakamura N; Ushida T; Kajiyama H; Kotani T
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Apr; 49(4):1154-1160. PubMed ID: 36746752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Misoprostol for labor induction in women with term premature rupture of membranes: a meta-analysis.
Lin MG; Nuthalapaty FS; Carver AR; Case AS; Ramsey PS
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 106(3):593-601. PubMed ID: 16135593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
