114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12885703)
1. Interchangeability of pencil-beam and fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in piglets and infants.
Koo WW; Hammami M; Hockman EM
Am J Clin Nutr; 2003 Aug; 78(2):236-40. PubMed ID: 12885703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition measurements in piglets.
Chauhan S; Koo WW; Hammami M; Hockman EM
J Am Coll Nutr; 2003 Oct; 22(5):408-14. PubMed ID: 14559933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Technical considerations for fan-beam dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry body composition measurements in pediatric studies.
Hammami M; Koo WW; Hockman EM
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2004; 28(5):328-33. PubMed ID: 15449572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of bone mass and body composition measurements in small subjects with pencil beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Koo WW; Hammami M; Hockman EM
J Am Coll Nutr; 2004 Feb; 23(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 14963057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of fan beam dual energy x-ray absorptiometry to measure body composition of piglets.
Koo WW; Hammami M; Hockman EM
J Nutr; 2002 Jun; 132(6):1380-3. PubMed ID: 12042462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Body composition of neonates from fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement.
Hammami M; Koo WW; Hockman EM
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2003; 27(6):423-6. PubMed ID: 14621124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The accuracy and precision of DXA for assessing body composition in team sport athletes.
Bilsborough JC; Greenway K; Opar D; Livingstone S; Cordy J; Coutts AJ
J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(19):1821-8. PubMed ID: 24914773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bone and body composition measurements of small subjects: discrepancies from software for fan-beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Koo WW; Hammami M; Shypailo RJ; Ellis KJ
J Am Coll Nutr; 2004 Dec; 23(6):647-50. PubMed ID: 15637212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone mineral and body composition measurements: cross-calibration of pencil-beam and fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers.
Ellis KJ; Shypailo RJ
J Bone Miner Res; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1613-8. PubMed ID: 9783550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the effectiveness of 2 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers with that of total body water and computed tomography in assessing changes in body composition during weight change.
Tylavsky FA; Lohman TG; Dockrell M; Lang T; Schoeller DA; Wan JY; Fuerst T; Cauley JA; Nevitt M; Harris TB
Am J Clin Nutr; 2003 Feb; 77(2):356-63. PubMed ID: 12540394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation and application of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry to measure bone mass and body composition in small infants.
Brunton JA; Bayley HS; Atkinson SA
Am J Clin Nutr; 1993 Dec; 58(6):839-45. PubMed ID: 8249864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in small subjects: conditions affecting clinical measurements.
Koo WW; Hockman EM; Hammami M
J Am Coll Nutr; 2004 Jun; 23(3):212-9. PubMed ID: 15190045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Agreement between dual x-ray absorptiometers using pencil beam and fan beam: indicators of bone health and whole-body plus appendicular tissue composition in adult athletes.
Tavares Ó; Duarte JP; Costa DC; Sousa-E-Silva P; Martinho D; Lus LGO; Duarte-Mendes P; Valente-Dos-Santos J; Conde J; Casanova JM; Cyrino ES; Coelho-E-Silva MJ
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2018 Apr; 64(4):330-338. PubMed ID: 30133612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans.
Blake GM; Parker JC; Buxton FM; Fogelman I
Br J Radiol; 1993 Oct; 66(790):902-6. PubMed ID: 8220974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Regional bone mass measurement from whole-body dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scan.
Hammami M; Koo MW; Koo WW; Thomas RT; Rakhman D
J Clin Densitom; 2001; 4(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 11477306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for body-composition assessment in piglets and term human neonates.
Picaud JC; Rigo J; Nyamugabo K; Milet J; Senterre J
Am J Clin Nutr; 1996 Feb; 63(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 8561054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improvement in the accuracy of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry for whole body and regional analysis of body composition: validation using piglets and methodologic considerations in infants.
Brunton JA; Weiler HA; Atkinson SA
Pediatr Res; 1997 Apr; 41(4 Pt 1):590-6. PubMed ID: 9098865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reference values of body composition obtained by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in preterm and term neonates.
Rigo J; Nyamugabo K; Picaud JC; Gerard P; Pieltain C; De Curtis M
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 1998 Aug; 27(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 9702651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hologic QDR 2000 whole-body scans: a comparison of three combinations of scan modes and analysis software.
Spector E; LeBlanc A; Shackelford L
Osteoporos Int; 1995; 5(6):440-5. PubMed ID: 8695965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differences between dual X-ray absorptiometry using pencil beam and fan beam modes and their determinants in vivo and in vitro.
Ruetsche AG; Lippuner K; Jaeger P; Casez JP
J Clin Densitom; 2000; 3(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 10871910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
