These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12885703)

  • 21. Pencil-beam vs fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry comparisons across four systems: body composition and bone mineral.
    Soriano JM; Ioannidou E; Wang J; Thornton JC; Horlick MN; Gallagher D; Heymsfield SB; Pierson RN
    J Clin Densitom; 2004; 7(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 15319498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The impact of recent technological advances on the trueness and precision of DXA to assess body composition.
    Toombs RJ; Ducher G; Shepherd JA; De Souza MJ
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2012 Jan; 20(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 21760631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Body composition analysis by dual X-ray absorptiometry: in vivo and in vitro comparison of three different fan-beam instruments.
    Aasen G; Fagertun H; Halse J
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2006; 66(8):659-66. PubMed ID: 17101558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Does Bone Mineral Density Differ between Fan-Beam and Pencil-Beam?: A Meta-Analysis and Systemic Review.
    Yoon BH; Koh YD; Yoo JI; Kim S; Lee GY; Park SB; Ha YC
    J Bone Metab; 2021 Feb; 28(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 33730785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validation of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) by comparison with chemical analysis of dogs and cats.
    Speakman JR; Booles D; Butterwick R
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Mar; 25(3):439-47. PubMed ID: 11319644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: clinical evaluation of a new cone-beam system.
    Blake GM; Knapp KM; Fogelman I
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2005 Feb; 76(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15645160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of pencil-, fan-, and cone-beam dual X-ray absorptiometers for evaluation of bone mineral content in excised rat bone.
    Libouban H; Simon Y; Silve C; Legrand E; Baslé MF; Audran M; Chappard D
    J Clin Densitom; 2002; 5(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 12665635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessing body composition in healthy newborn infants: reliability of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
    Godang K; Qvigstad E; Voldner N; Isaksen GA; Frøslie KF; Nøtthellen J; Henriksen T; Bollerslev J
    J Clin Densitom; 2010; 13(2):151-60. PubMed ID: 20378381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Repeatability and reproducibility of measurements obtained by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry on pig carcasses.
    Kipper M; Marcoux M; Andretta I; Pomar C
    J Anim Sci; 2018 May; 96(5):2027-2037. PubMed ID: 29722809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Validation of accuracy and precision of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for infants.
    Koo WW; Massom LR; Walters J
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1111-5. PubMed ID: 7484287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of predicting chemical body composition of growing pigs using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Kasper C; Schlegel P; Ruiz-Ascacibar I; Stoll P; Bee G
    Animal; 2021 Aug; 15(8):100307. PubMed ID: 34273875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Technical considerations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based bone mineral measurements for pediatric studies.
    Koo WW; Walters J; Bush AJ
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Dec; 10(12):1998-2004. PubMed ID: 8619381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validation of fan beam dual energy x ray absorptiometry for body composition assessment in adults aged 18-45 years.
    Norcross J; Van Loan MD
    Br J Sports Med; 2004 Aug; 38(4):472-6. PubMed ID: 15273189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. DXA performance in a pediatric population: precision of body composition measurements in healthy term-born infants using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    de Knegt VE; Carlsen EM; Bech Jensen JE; Lade Rasmussen AM; Pryds O
    J Clin Densitom; 2015; 18(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 25439455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Body composition analysis of small pigs by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
    Mitchell AD; Scholz AM; Conway JM
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Sep; 76(9):2392-8. PubMed ID: 9781495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The intra- and inter-instrument reliability of DXA based on ex vivo soft tissue measurements.
    Guo Y; Franks PW; Brookshire T; Antonio Tataranni P
    Obes Res; 2004 Dec; 12(12):1925-9. PubMed ID: 15687392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Regional body composition: cross-calibration of DXA scanners--QDR4500W and Discovery Wi.
    Covey MK; Berry JK; Hacker ED
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2010 Mar; 18(3):632-7. PubMed ID: 19960003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Neonatal body composition: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, magnetic resonance imaging, and three-dimensional chemical shift imaging versus chemical analysis in piglets.
    Fusch C; Slotboom J; Fuehrer U; Schumacher R; Keisker A; Zimmermann W; Moessinger A; Boesch C; Blum J
    Pediatr Res; 1999 Oct; 46(4):465-73. PubMed ID: 10509370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: cross-calibration of a new fan-beam system.
    Blake GM; Harrison EJ; Adams JE
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2004 Jul; 75(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 15037973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in small subjects: influence of dual-energy X-ray equipment on assessment of mineralization and body composition in newborn piglets.
    Picaud JC; Nyamugabo K; Braillon P; Lapillonne A; Claris O; Delmas P; Meunier P; Salle B; Rigo J
    Pediatr Res; 1999 Dec; 46(6):772-7. PubMed ID: 10590038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.