119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12886175)
21. The cost-effectiveness of iodine 131 scintigraphy, ultrasonography, and fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the initial diagnosis of solitary thyroid nodules.
Khalid AN; Hollenbeak CS; Quraishi SA; Fan CY; Stack BC
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Mar; 132(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 16549743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical management of nonpalpable or small breast masses by fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) under ultrasound guidance.
Okamoto H; Ogawara T; Inoue S; Kobayashi K; Sekikawa T; Matsumoto Y
J Surg Oncol; 1998 Apr; 67(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 9579372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of palpable breast masses.
Klein S
Am Fam Physician; 2005 May; 71(9):1731-8. PubMed ID: 15887452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cost minimization analysis of ultrasound-guided diagnostic evaluation of probably benign breast lesions.
Lee CI; Wells CJ; Bassett LW
Breast J; 2013; 19(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 23186174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fine-needle aspiration in the management of breast masses.
Layfield LJ; Glasgow BJ; Cramer H
Pathol Annu; 1989; 24 Pt 2():23-62. PubMed ID: 2671883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A new score for the evaluation of palpable breast masses in women under age 40.
Morris KT; Vetto JT; Petty JK; Lum SS; Schmidt WA; Toth-Fejel S; Pommier RF
Am J Surg; 2002 Oct; 184(4):346-7. PubMed ID: 12383898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnostic tests in breast cancer. Clinical strategies based on diagnostic probabilities.
Mushlin AI
Ann Intern Med; 1985 Jul; 103(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 3890659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy of triple test score in the diagnosis of palpable breast lump.
Ghimire B; Khan MI; Bibhusal T; Singh Y; Sayami P
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2008; 47(172):189-92. PubMed ID: 19079392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic core needle biopsy: analysis by means of mammographic findings.
Lee CH; Egglin TK; Philpotts L; Mainiero MB; Tocino I
Radiology; 1997 Mar; 202(3):849-54. PubMed ID: 9051045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Role of triple test score in the evaluation of palpable breast lump.
Kachewar SS; Dongre SD
Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol; 2015; 36(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 26157290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Estimating the cost-effectiveness of stereotaxic biopsy for nonpalpable breast abnormalities: a decision analysis model.
Hillner BE; Bear HD; Fajardo LL
Acad Radiol; 1996 Apr; 3(4):351-60. PubMed ID: 8796686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Performance Goals for an Adjunct Diagnostic Test to Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies After Screening Mammography: Analysis of Costs, Benefits, and Consequences.
Lee CI; Bensink ME; Berry K; Musa Z; Bodnar C; Dann R; Jarvik JG; Lehman CD; Ramsey SD
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Nov; 13(11S):R81-R88. PubMed ID: 27814820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Preoperative needle biopsy: an improvement in palpable breast tumors with strong indications for malignancy].
Zonderland HM; van de Velde CJ; van de Vijver MJ; Hermans J
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1996 Sep; 140(39):1952-6. PubMed ID: 8927182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Large-core needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration biopsy in solid breast lesions: comparison of costs and diagnostic value.
Vimpeli SM; Saarenmaa I; Huhtala H; Soimakallio S
Acta Radiol; 2008 Oct; 49(8):863-9. PubMed ID: 18618302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accurate and cost-effective evaluation of breast masses in males.
Vetto J; Schmidt W; Pommier R; DiTomasso J; Eppich H; Wood W; Moseson D
Am J Surg; 1998 May; 175(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 9600283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cost-benefit analysis of biopsy methods for suspicious mammographic lesions; discussion 994-5.
Fahy BN; Bold RJ; Schneider PD; Khatri V; Goodnight JE
Arch Surg; 2001 Sep; 136(9):990-4. PubMed ID: 11529819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cost minimization study of image-guided core biopsy versus surgical excisional biopsy for women with abnormal mammograms.
Golub RM; Bennett CL; Stinson T; Venta L; Morrow M
J Clin Oncol; 2004 Jun; 22(12):2430-7. PubMed ID: 15197205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of stereotaxic core breast biopsy on cost of diagnosis.
Liberman L; Fahs MC; Dershaw DD; Bonaccio E; Abramson AF; Cohen MA; Hann LE
Radiology; 1995 Jun; 195(3):633-7. PubMed ID: 7753986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.
Okonkwo QL; Draisma G; der Kinderen A; Brown ML; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Accuracy of mammographic appearances after breast fine-needle aspiration.
Hindle WH; Chen EC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 176(6):1286-90; discussion 1290-2. PubMed ID: 9215186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
