These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12886209)

  • 21. Cuspal deflection of maxillary premolars restored with bonded amalgam.
    el-Badrawy WA
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 10823082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of occlusal restoration on stresses around class V restoration interface: a finite-element study.
    Vasudeva G; Bogra P; Nikhil V; Singh V
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 21891903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of coronal restorations on the fracture resistance of root canal-treated premolar and molar teeth: a retrospective study.
    Dammaschke T; Nykiel K; Sagheri D; Schäfer E
    Aust Endod J; 2013 Aug; 39(2):48-56. PubMed ID: 23890259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Coronal pulp dimensions in noncarious and restored deciduous second molars: a radiovisiographic study.
    Arpana V; Prabhakar AR; Raju OS
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2010; 77(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 20359429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Amalgam or composite resin? Factors influencing the choice of restorative material.
    Correa MB; Peres MA; Peres KG; Horta BL; Barros AD; Demarco FF
    J Dent; 2012 Sep; 40(9):703-10. PubMed ID: 22546263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of three direct restorative materials on molar cuspal fracture resistance.
    Allara FW; Diefenderfer KE; Molinaro JD
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 15478480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Detection of proximal secondary caries at cervical class II-amalgam restoration margins in vitro.
    Neuhaus KW; Rodrigues JA; Seemann R; Lussi A
    J Dent; 2012 Jun; 40(6):493-9. PubMed ID: 22429927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fracture resistance of premolars with bonded class II amalgams.
    Dias de Souza GM; Pereira GD; Dias CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):349-53. PubMed ID: 12120771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical performance of a compomer and amalgam for the interproximal restoration of primary molars: a 24-month evaluation.
    Duggal MS; Toumba KJ; Sharma NK
    Br Dent J; 2002 Sep; 193(6):339-42. PubMed ID: 12368893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2011 Aug; 39(8):527-35. PubMed ID: 21620926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prevalence of cusp fractures in teeth restored with amalgam and with resin-based composite.
    Wahl MJ; Schmitt MM; Overton DA; Gordon MK
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Aug; 135(8):1127-32; quiz 1164-5. PubMed ID: 15387051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Resistance to fracture of teeth with various preparations for amalgam.
    Caron GA; Murchison DF; Cohen RB; Broome JC
    J Dent; 1996 Nov; 24(6):407-10. PubMed ID: 8990685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth.
    Qualtrough AJ; Cawte SG; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Structural optimization of dental restorations using the principle of adaptive growth.
    Couegnat G; Fok SL; Cooper JE; Qualtrough AJ
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 16061281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of bonded restorations on the fracture resistance of root filled teeth.
    Sagsen B; Aslan B
    Int Endod J; 2006 Nov; 39(11):900-4. PubMed ID: 17014529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The influence of approximal restoration extension on the development of secondary caries.
    Kuper NK; Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Huysmans MC
    J Dent; 2012 Mar; 40(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 22226997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth.
    Oliveira JP; Cochran MA; Moore BK
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 9002870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An in vitro Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of endodontically treated Teeth with Different Restorative Materials.
    Sangwan B; Rishi R; Seal M; Jain K; Dutt P; Talukdar P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):549-52. PubMed ID: 27595720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.