These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12886215)

  • 1. A sectional stock tray system for making impressions.
    Ohkubo C; Ohkubo C; Hosoi T; Kurtz KS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 12886215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impression material thickness in stock and custom trays.
    Bomberg TJ; Hatch RA; Hoffman W
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Aug; 54(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 3903109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of Pindex system in fabrication of the sectional custom tray.
    Jabbari E; Savabi O; Nejatidanesh F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):417-9. PubMed ID: 24417537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preliminary impression in patients with microstomia.
    Moghadam BK
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jan; 67(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 1548600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distortion of disposable plastic stock trays when used with putty vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Cho GC; Chee WW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Oct; 92(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 15507908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Custom sectional impression trays with interlocking type handle for microstomia patients.
    Fernandes AS; Mascarenhas K; Aras MA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):370-3. PubMed ID: 19884726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of relief space and escape holes on pressure characteristics of maxillary edentulous impressions.
    Komiyama O; Saeki H; Kawara M; Kobayashi K; Otake S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):570-6. PubMed ID: 15211300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An alternative method of fabricating a custom tray for direct implant impressions.
    Cura C; Isik FG; Dundar M
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(1):e22-4. PubMed ID: 21613027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of impression trays on the accuracy of stone casts poured from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.
    Mendez AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Sep; 54(3):383-8. PubMed ID: 3906093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technique for making flexible impression trays for the microstomic patient.
    Whitsitt JA; Battle LW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Oct; 52(4):608-9. PubMed ID: 6389845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs.
    Masri R; Driscoll CF; Burkhardt J; Von Fraunhofer A; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12237795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sectional impression tray for patients with constricted oral opening.
    Luebke RJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Jul; 52(1):135-7. PubMed ID: 6379156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The accuracy of dual-arch impressions: a pilot study.
    Larson TD; Nielsen MA; Brackett WW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):625-7. PubMed ID: 12131884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An alternative impression technique for complete dentures.
    Yilmaz B; Özçelik TB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Feb; 111(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 24286641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of tray type and other variables on the palatal depth of casts made from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.
    Frank RP; Thielke SM; Johnson GH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jan; 87(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 11807479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Effects of different tray types on the resulting impression].
    Biffar R; Bittner B
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Aug; 44(8):624-7. PubMed ID: 2700730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of impression tray techniques in microstomic patients.
    Hasanreisoglu U; Uçtasli S; Gurbuz A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1992 Sep; 1(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 1291022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.