73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1288651)
1. Assessment of the accuracy of cytology in women referred for colposcopy and biopsy: the results of a 1 year audit.
Contreras-Melendez L; Herbert A; Millward-Sadler GH; Moore IE; Masson GM; Camillieri AP; Shepherd N
Cytopathology; 1992; 3(5):267-74. PubMed ID: 1288651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The borderline cervical smear: colposcopic and biopsy outcome.
al-Nafussi A; Rebello G; al-Yusif R; McGoogan E
J Clin Pathol; 2000 Jun; 53(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 10911801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Colposcopic management of high-grade referral smears: a retrospective audit supporting 'see and treat'?
Errington CA; Roberts M; Tindle P; Michael E; Bulmer JN; Wadehra V
Cytopathology; 2006 Dec; 17(6):339-47. PubMed ID: 17168916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Regular audit of colposcopic biopsies from women with a mildly dyskaryotic or borderline cervical smear results in fewer cases of CINIII.
Jones MH; Jenkins D; Singer A
Cytopathology; 1996 Feb; 7(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 8833870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The accuracy of repeat cytology in women with mildly dyskaryotic smears.
Giles JA; Deery A; Crow J; Walker P
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Sep; 96(9):1067-70. PubMed ID: 2804009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical glandular neoplasia referrals and the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ: Correlating cytology, colposcopy findings, and clinical outcomes.
Nikolopoulos M; Athanasias P; Godfrey MAL; Nikolopoulos K; Maheshwari MK
Cytopathology; 2021 Nov; 32(6):751-757. PubMed ID: 34181788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcome analysis of 4 years' follow-up of patients referred for colposcopy with one smear showing mild dyskaryosis.
Ahmed AS; Goumalatsos G; Akbar N; Lawton FG; Savvas M
Cytopathology; 2008 Apr; 19(2):94-105. PubMed ID: 17937774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Management of women with mild and moderate cervical dyskaryosis.
Flannelly G; Anderson D; Kitchener HC; Mann EM; Campbell M; Fisher P; Walker F; Templeton AA
BMJ; 1994 May; 308(6941):1399-403. PubMed ID: 8019248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A retrospective study of cervical screening in women under 25 years (2005-2009).
Ali AA; Richardson D; Hill N
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 287(4):765-9. PubMed ID: 23183714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value of repeat cytology at the time of colposcopy for the evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia on Papanicolaou smears.
Wheelock JB; Kaminski PF
J Reprod Med; 1989 Oct; 34(10):815-7. PubMed ID: 2795564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The cytological prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in colposcopically directed biopsies.
Parham DM; Wiredu EK; Hussein KA
Cytopathology; 1991; 2(6):285-90. PubMed ID: 1801949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does mild atypia on a cervical smear warrant further investigation?
Walker EM; Dodgson J; Duncan ID
Lancet; 1986 Sep; 2(8508):672-3. PubMed ID: 2876144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How significant is a cervical smear showing glandular dyskaryosis?
Pisal NV; Sindos M; Desai S; Mansell E; Singer A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2003 Jun; 108(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 12781413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Four and a half year follow up of women with dyskaryotic cervical smears.
Fletcher A; Metaxas N; Grubb C; Chamberlain J
BMJ; 1990 Sep; 301(6753):641-4. PubMed ID: 2224218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prevalence of high-grade CIN following mild dyskaryotic smears in different age groups.
Giannopoulos T; Butler-Manuel S; Tailor A; Demetriou E; Daborn L
Cytopathology; 2005 Dec; 16(6):277-80. PubMed ID: 16303040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combined cytology and colposcopy to screen for cervical cancer in pregnancy.
Guerra B; De Simone P; Gabrielli S; Falco P; Montanari G; Bovicelli L
J Reprod Med; 1998 Aug; 43(8):647-53. PubMed ID: 9749413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cytological status and lesion size: a further dimension in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Jarmulowicz MR; Jenkins D; Barton SE; Goodall AL; Hollingworth A; Singer A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Sep; 96(9):1061-6. PubMed ID: 2804008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An explanation for the problem of false-negative cervical smears.
Barton SE; Jenkins D; Hollingworth A; Cuzick J; Singer A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Apr; 96(4):482-5. PubMed ID: 2751964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Audit of cervical screening and colposcopy in HIV-positive women at a central London teaching hospital.
Vonau BU; Boag F; Barton SE
Int J STD AIDS; 1999 Nov; 10(11):755-8. PubMed ID: 10563567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The cytological detection of persistent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after local ablative treatment: a comparison of sampling devices.
Hughes RG; Haddad NG; Smart GE; Colquhoun M; McGoogan E; MacIntyre CC; Prescott RJ
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Jun; 99(6):498-502. PubMed ID: 1637767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
