73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1288651)
21. Do all grade I lesions on colposcopy need to be biopsied?
Suneja A; Guleria K; Mahishee ; Mishra K; Agarwal N
Indian J Cancer; 1999; 36(2-4):135-40. PubMed ID: 10921217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Women with human immunodeficiency virus infection and abnormal Papanicolaou smears: a prospective study of colposcopy and clinical outcome.
Adachi A; Fleming I; Burk RD; Ho GY; Klein RS
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Mar; 81(3):372-7. PubMed ID: 8437789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of colposcopy in the postmenopausal woman.
Toplis PJ; Casemore V; Hallam N; Charnock M
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Aug; 93(8):843-51. PubMed ID: 3741812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Should patients with mild atypia in a cervical smear be referred for colposcopy?
Soutter WP; Wisdom S; Brough AK; Monaghan JM
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Jan; 93(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 3942709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Analysis of outcome in women with borderline glandular change on cervical cytology.
Jadoon BA; Kehoe S; Romain K; Clelland C; Sundar SS
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Nov; 147(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 19740591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Verification of the accuracy of cervical cytology reports in women referred for colposcopy.
Papathanasiou K; Daniilidis A; Koutsos I; Sardeli C; Giannoulis C; Tzafettas J
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2010; 31(2):187-90. PubMed ID: 20527237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Towards a more rational policy for colposcopy.
Camilleri-Ferrante C; Camilleri AP
Public Health; 1992 Sep; 106(5):401-4. PubMed ID: 1410226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy: a 17-year experience.
Economos K; Perez Veridiano N; Delke I; Collado ML; Tancer ML
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):915-8. PubMed ID: 8497355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Colposcopy in a family planning clinic: a future model?
Kitchener HC; Burnett RA; Wilson ES; Cordiner JW
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 May; 294(6583):1313-5. PubMed ID: 3109632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The value of cervical cytology in HIV-infected women.
Del Priore G; Maag T; Bhattacharya M; Garcia PM; Till M; Lurain JR
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Mar; 56(3):395-8. PubMed ID: 7705674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Is this the end of the line for the moderate dyskaryotic smear?
Harry VN; Narayansingh GV; Parkin DE
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2008 Jan; 12(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 18162808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Colposcopic evaluation of patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
Benedet JL; Boyes DA; Nichols TM; Millner A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1976 Mar; 83(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 1252383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The significance of atypical cervical smears.
Morrison BW; Erickson ER; Doshi N; Russo JF
J Reprod Med; 1988 Oct; 33(10):809-12. PubMed ID: 3193410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparison of simultaneous cervical cytology, HPV testing, and colposcopy.
Hockstad RL
Fam Pract Res J; 1992 Mar; 12(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 1312758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Repeating cytology at initial colposcopy does not improve detection of high-grade abnormalities: a retrospective cohort study of 6595 women.
Rieck GC; Bhaumik J; Beer HR; Leeson SC
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 May; 101(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 16325241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Decision analysis for best management of mildly dyskaryotic smear.
Johnson N; Sutton J; Thornton JG; Lilford RJ; Johnson VA; Peel KR
Lancet; 1993 Jul; 342(8863):91-6. PubMed ID: 8100917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Inflammatory atypia on cervical smears. A diagnostic dilemma for the gynecologist.
Busseniers AE; Sidawy MK
J Reprod Med; 1991 Feb; 36(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 2010900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Negative cone biopsies after colposcopy and their prediction.
Luesley DM; Wade-Evans T; Jordan JA; Woodman CB
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1987 Sep; 94(9):895-900. PubMed ID: 3663552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Every woman with an abnormal cervical smear should be referred for treatment: debate.
Flannelly G; Kitchener H
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Sep; 38(3):585-91. PubMed ID: 8612368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Five-year follow-up of women with borderline and mildly dyskaryotic cervical smears.
Rana DN; Marshall J; Desai M; Kitchener HC; Perera DM; El Teraifi H; Persad RV
Cytopathology; 2004 Oct; 15(5):263-70. PubMed ID: 15456414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
