These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12886709)

  • 81. TX: ER nurses triage chest pain patient: patient dies of cardiac arrest in waiting room.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Jul; 45(2):3. PubMed ID: 15382495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Can physicians testify as to "nursing negligence"?
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Oct; 35(5):1. PubMed ID: 7816923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. General form for requesting hospital documents.
    Milazzo VL
    Natl Med Leg J; 1991; 2(2):3. PubMed ID: 1747430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Nurses failed to 'advocate' for their patient. Case on point: Rowe v. Sisters of Pallottine Missionary Society, 2001 WL 1585453 s.e.2d -WV.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Jan; 42(8):2. PubMed ID: 15301071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Suit alleging RNs & MDs responsible for brain injury to newborn dismissed. Case on point: C.A. v. Bentolila, A-1261-11T1 NJSUP (8/9/2012)-NJ.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2012 Aug; 53(3):4. PubMed ID: 22997684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Dr. fails to leave post-op. orders: nurses fail to timely call Dr. Case on point: Lupinacci v. Med. Center of Delaware, 2002 WL 31006263 N.E.2d. -DE (2002).
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Sep; 43(4):2. PubMed ID: 12375397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. The nurse and a civil lawsuit.
    Creighton H
    Nurs Manage; 1985 Dec; 16(12):14-5. PubMed ID: 3852178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Introduction to notification, deposition, and court testimony: A primer for the defendant physician.
    Bounds JA
    Neurol Clin; 1999 May; 17(2):335-43. PubMed ID: 10196414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. RN not at fault for failure to give epinephrin. Taylor v. Jackson-Madison Cnty. Gen. Hosp., No.W2005-02471-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. App. 8/23/06) -Tn.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2006 Oct; 47(5):2. PubMed ID: 17117601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Would you appeal a $3.2 million verdict in your favor? Case on point: Kunz v. Little Co. of Mary Hosp., 869 N.E. 328 -IL (2007).
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2007 Oct; 48(5):2. PubMed ID: 17992820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. A malpractice lawsuit simulation: critical care providers learn as participants in a mock trial.
    Jenkins RC; Lemak CH
    Crit Care Nurse; 2009 Aug; 29(4):52-60. PubMed ID: 19648598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Nursing malpractice litigation: a personal journey.
    Sorich MP; Letizia M
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1994; 19(5):249-54; discussion 257. PubMed ID: 7880248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Who has responsibility to monitor O.R. blood loss? Case in point: Uhr v. Lutheran General Hospital (589 N.E.2d 723--IL [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Sep; 33(4):2. PubMed ID: 1410393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. NY: Missing signature on discharge summary: does this mean no instructions were given? DeLorenzo v. St. Clare's Hospital of Schenectady, 2010-00433 (1/21/2010)-NY.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Feb; 50(9):3. PubMed ID: 20235367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Nurse fails to follow doctor's orders: jury fails to follow instructions. Case in point: Ward v. St. Mary Med. Center of Gary 645 N.E. 2d 1130--IN (1995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Apr; 35(11):4. PubMed ID: 7746867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. RN's testimony as to 'cause' of bedsores ruled admissible. Case on point: Freed v. Geisinger Medical Center, 2009-PA-08-P-1818 (6/15/2009)-PA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2009 Oct; 50(5):2. PubMed ID: 19928310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Nurse-expert's testimony held admissible. Case in point: Wickliffe v. Sunrise Hosp., Inc. (766 P. 2d 1322--NV (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Mar; 29(10):2. PubMed ID: 2704834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. [Development of expert assessment in the malpractice lawsuit from the viewpoint of the judge].
    Franzki H
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):652-6; discussion 656-7. PubMed ID: 9064942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Should nurse have called 'on-call' obstetrician stat? Case on point: Garhart v. Columbia/HealthONE, L.L.C., 2004 WL 1433331 P.2d -CO.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Jul; 45(2):2. PubMed ID: 15382493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Known allergy not on printout: nurses' duties. Case in point: Harris County Hosp. Dist. v. Estrada 872 S.W. 2d 759 TX (1993).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jun; 35(1):2. PubMed ID: 8047644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.