125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12887498)
1. No-scalpel vasectomy: a cautionary tale of failure.
Barros D'Sa IJ; Guy PJ
BJU Int; 2003 Aug; 92(3):331-2. PubMed ID: 12887498
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. No-scalpel vasectomy: a minimally invasive procedure.
Jow WW; Goldstein M
Contemp Urol; 1993 Apr; 5(4):37-44, 50-2. PubMed ID: 10148523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. No-scalpel vasectomy: a cautionary tale of failure.
Davies RJ
BJU Int; 2004 Feb; 93(3):424-5. PubMed ID: 14764157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Vasectomy occlusion technique combining thermal cautery and fascial interposition.
Labrecque M
Int Braz J Urol; 2011; 37(5):630-5. PubMed ID: 22099275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive vas surgery using a newly designed double-ringed clamp.
Moon HJ
World J Urol; 2010 Apr; 28(2):205-8. PubMed ID: 19543734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A minimally invasive vasectomy with the no suture, inline method for vas occlusion.
Marmar JL; Kessler S; Hartanto VH
Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2001; 46(5):257-64. PubMed ID: 11720198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comments on vasectomy closure techniques.
Reynolds RD
Am Fam Physician; 2000 Jan; 61(2):305-6; author reply 307-8. PubMed ID: 10670497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Vasectomy with vessel sealing device: comparison of different diameters.
Guzelburc V; Baran C; Yafi FA; Cakir A; Kiremit MC; Boz MY; Horuz R; Guven S; Hellstrom WJG; Albayrak S
Int J Impot Res; 2019 Jan; 31(1):20-24. PubMed ID: 30154455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. No-scalpel vasectomy outside China.
Xu B; Huang WD
Asian J Androl; 2000 Mar; 2(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 11228932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk of vasectomy failure by ligation and excision with fascial interposition: A prospective descriptive study.
Miranda Claro SJ; Vargas Laverde J; Mariño Samper E; Ibáñez Pinilla M; Torres Quiroz DS; Labrecque M
Contraception; 2020 May; 101(5):342-349. PubMed ID: 32061567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness and complications associated with 2 vasectomy occlusion techniques.
Labrecque M; Nazerali H; Mondor M; Fortin V; Nasution M
J Urol; 2002 Dec; 168(6):2495-8; discussion 2498. PubMed ID: 12441948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Office procedures. No-scalpel vasectomy.
Davis LE; Stockton MD
Prim Care; 1997 Jun; 24(2):433-61. PubMed ID: 9174047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of surgical clips prevents suture slippage when ligating folded vas deferens during vasectomy.
Hadj-Moussa M; Brown JA
Can J Urol; 2010 Jun; 17(3):5213-5. PubMed ID: 20566017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Editorial comment re: Use of surgical clips prevents suture slippage when ligating folded vas deferens during vasectomy.
Trussell JC
Can J Urol; 2010 Jun; 17(3):5215. PubMed ID: 20566018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Marie Stopes scalpel and electrocautery no-scalpel vasectomy techniques.
Black T; Francome C
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2003 Apr; 29(2):32-4. PubMed ID: 12681035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [No-scalpel vasectomy].
Viladoms Fuster JM; Shihua Li P
Arch Esp Urol; 1994 Sep; 47(7):695-701. PubMed ID: 7802473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. No-scalpel vasectomy: a technique for family physicians.
Stockton MD; Davis LE; Bolton KM
Am Fam Physician; 1992 Oct; 46(4):1153-67. PubMed ID: 1414881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. No-scalpel vasectomy.
Schlegel PN; Goldstein M
Semin Urol; 1992 Nov; 10(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 1485070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vas deferens occlusion during no-scalpel vasectomy.
Reynolds RD
J Fam Pract; 1994 Dec; 39(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 7798862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Percutaneous vasectomy: a simple modification eliminates the steep learning curve of no-scalpel vasectomy.
Jones JS
J Urol; 2003 Apr; 169(4):1434-6. PubMed ID: 12629378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
