149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12887626)
1. Comparison of the techniques of evaluation of urine dilution/concentration in the dog.
Dossin O; Germain C; Braun JP
J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med; 2003 Aug; 50(6):322-5. PubMed ID: 12887626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Evaluation of a test strip for the determination of urine specific gravity in the dog].
van Vonderen IK; Kooistra HS; de Bruijne JJ
Tijdschr Diergeneeskd; 1995 Jul; 120(13):400-2. PubMed ID: 7610450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is specific gravity a good estimate of urine osmolality?
Imran S; Eva G; Christopher S; Flynn E; Henner D
J Clin Lab Anal; 2010; 24(6):426-30. PubMed ID: 21089176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Association between urine osmolality and specific gravity in dogs and the effect of commonly measured urine solutes on that association.
Ayoub JA; Beaufrere H; Acierno MJ
Am J Vet Res; 2013 Dec; 74(12):1542-5. PubMed ID: 24274893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of preanalytic and analytic variables in canine and feline urine specific gravity measurement by refractometer.
Mösch M; Reese S; Weber K; Hartmann K; Dorsch R
J Vet Diagn Invest; 2020 Jan; 32(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 31876254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of osmolality and refractometric readings of Hispaniolan Amazon parrot (Amazona ventralis) urine.
Brock AP; Grunkemeyer VL; Fry MM; Hall JS; Bartges JW
J Avian Med Surg; 2013 Dec; 27(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 24640927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of a digital and an optical analogue hand-held refractometer for the measurement of canine urine specific gravity.
Paris JK; Bennett AD; Dodkin SJ; Gunn-Moore DA
Vet Rec; 2012 May; 170(18):463. PubMed ID: 22505243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variability among four refractometers for the measurement of urine specific gravity and comparison with urine osmolality in dogs.
Rudinsky AJ; Wellman M; Tracy G; Stoltenberg L; DiBartola SP; Chew DJ
Vet Clin Pathol; 2019 Dec; 48(4):702-709. PubMed ID: 31612506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Urinary specific gravity--comparative measurements using reagent strips and refractometer in 340 morning urine samples].
Siegrist D; Hess B; Montandon M; Takkinen R; Lippuner K; Jaeger P
Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1993 Jan; 82(4):112-6. PubMed ID: 8434200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of hydrometry, refractometry, osmometry and Ames N-Multistix SG in estimation of urinary concentration.
McCrossin T; Roy LP
Aust Paediatr J; 1985 Aug; 21(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 4062717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Urine specific gravity measurements: comparison of a new reagent strip method with existing methodologies, as applied to the water concentration/dilution tests.
Gounden D; Newall RG
Curr Med Res Opin; 1983; 8(6):375-81. PubMed ID: 6851620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of digital and optical hand-held refractometers for the measurement of feline urine specific gravity.
Bennett AD; McKnight GE; Dodkin SJ; Simpson KE; Schwartz AM; Gunn-Moore DA
J Feline Med Surg; 2011 Feb; 13(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 21186131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intra- and interindividual variation in urine osmolality and urine specific gravity in healthy pet dogs of various ages.
van Vonderen IK; Kooistra HS; Rijnberk A
J Vet Intern Med; 1997; 11(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 9132481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of correction formulas for canine and feline urine specific gravity measured using a Japanese refractometer.
Miyagawa Y; Tominaga Y; Toda N; Takemura N
J Vet Med Sci; 2011 May; 73(5):679-81. PubMed ID: 21187683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect on urine specific gravity of the addition of glucose to urine samples of dogs and cats.
Behrend EN; Botsford AN; Mueller SA; Hofmeister EH; Lee HP
Am J Vet Res; 2019 Oct; 80(10):907-911. PubMed ID: 31556718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interobserver reliability of canine urine specific gravity assessed by analog or digital refractometers.
Rowe JC; Hokamp JA; Braatz JN; Freitag-Engstrom JR; Stephens NL; Chew DJ; Langston C; Rudinsky AJ
J Vet Diagn Invest; 2021 May; 33(3):611-614. PubMed ID: 33648398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Urine Reagent Strips Are Inaccurate for Assessing Hypohydration: A Brief Report.
Adams JD; Capitan-Jiménez C; Huggins RA; Casa DJ; Mauromoustakos A; Kavouras SA
Clin J Sport Med; 2019 Nov; 29(6):506-508. PubMed ID: 29708888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparative measurement of urine specific gravity: reagent strips, refractometry and hydrometry].
Costa CE; Bettendorff C; Bupo S; Ayuso S; Vallejo G
Arch Argent Pediatr; 2010 Jun; 108(3):234-8. PubMed ID: 20544138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of hetastarch (670/0.75) on urine specific gravity and osmolality in the dog.
Smart L; Hopper K; Aldrich J; George J; Kass P; Haskins S
J Vet Intern Med; 2009; 23(2):388-91. PubMed ID: 19192143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (6%) and succinylated gelatine (4%) interfere with refractometry in dogs with haemorrhagic shock.
Yam E; Boyd CJ; Hosgood G; Claus MA; Raisis AL; Sharp CR; Smart L
Vet Anaesth Analg; 2019 Sep; 46(5):579-586. PubMed ID: 31401048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
