These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

28 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1288806)

  • 1. Primary Stability of Implants Inserted into Polyurethane Blocks: Micro-CT and Analysis In Vitro.
    Dura Haddad C; Andreatti L; Zelezetsky I; Porrelli D; Turco G; Bevilacqua L; Maglione M
    Bioengineering (Basel); 2024 Apr; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 38671804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative study on the initial stability of different implants placed above the bone level using resonance frequency analysis.
    Kang IH; Kim CW; Lim YJ; Kim MJ
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2011 Dec; 3(4):190-5. PubMed ID: 22259702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of the Periotest system. Part II: Reliability and repeatability of instruments. Dental Implant Clinical Research Group (Planning Committee).
    Manz MC; Morris HF; Ochi S
    Implant Dent; 1992; 1(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 1288817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of the Periotest value as the initial success criteria of an implant: 8-year report.
    Aparicio C
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1997 Apr; 17(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 9497709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship between contact time measurements and PTV values when using the Periotest to measure implant stability.
    Meredith N; Friberg B; Sennerby L; Aparicio C
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 9728122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of implant mobility at second-stage surgery with the Periotest: DICRG Interim Report No. 3. Dental Implant Clinical Research Group.
    Truhlar RS; Morris HF; Ochi S; Winkler S
    Implant Dent; 1994; 3(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 7749399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of the resonance frequency analysis device: examiner reliability and repeatability of readings.
    Gupta RK; Padmanabhan TV
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Dec; 39(6):704-7. PubMed ID: 21970725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of the Periotest system. Part I: Examiner reliability and repeatability of readings. Dental Implant Clinical Group (Planning Committee).
    Manz MC; Morris HF; Ochi S
    Implant Dent; 1992; 1(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 1288806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity and clinical significance of biomechanical testing of implant/bone interface.
    Aparicio C; Lang NP; Rangert B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():2-7. PubMed ID: 16968377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant.
    Meredith N
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(5):491-501. PubMed ID: 9922740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of age, jaw site, and bone condition on oral implant outcomes.
    Bryant SR
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(5):470-90. PubMed ID: 9922739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Periotest to monitor osseointegration and to check the occlusion in oral implantology.
    Schulte W; Lukas D
    J Oral Implantol; 1993; 19(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 8246291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.