These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1288833)

  • 21. Pros and cons of open peer review.
    Nat Neurosci; 1999 Mar; 2(3):197-8. PubMed ID: 10195206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Contribution of peer review to scientific progress.
    Sly RM
    Ann Allergy; 1989 Aug; 63(2):85. PubMed ID: 2764318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The peer-review system.
    Pitkin RM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 82(2):304-5. PubMed ID: 8336882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Peer review of scientific papers.
    Armstrong JS
    J Biol Response Mod; 1984; 3(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 6707695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Peer review.
    Nature; 1989 Sep; 341(6240):275. PubMed ID: 2797137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Journal peer review.
    N Engl J Med; 1985 Aug; 313(7):455-6. PubMed ID: 4022077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Peer review.
    Nature; 1989 Jun; 339(6224):414. PubMed ID: 2725672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Peer review and the fate of manuscripts.
    Frey JJ
    Fam Med; 1985; 17(1):3. PubMed ID: 3843084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Editorial peer review in medicine.
    Lock S
    Recenti Prog Med; 1991 Jan; 82(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 2028075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Harefuah peer review].
    Shemer Y; Shoenfeld Y
    Harefuah; 2001 May; 140(5):403-5. PubMed ID: 11419062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Conflict in peer review.
    Lawrence DJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1990 May; 13(4):177-8. PubMed ID: 2351879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Peer review in medical journals].
    Matías-Guiu J
    Rev Neurol; 1996 Jul; 24(131):765-6. PubMed ID: 8681185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Peer review and accountability.
    Hardy LK
    Can J Nurs Res; 1991; 23(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 1802369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Peer review for the "Revista de Investigación Clínica].
    Loría A; Lisker R
    Rev Invest Clin; 1994; 46(3):175-6. PubMed ID: 7973139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Peer review unmasked.
    Brunier G
    J CANNT; 1997; 7(3):23-5. PubMed ID: 9362729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Peer review and the New York State Dental Journal.
    Feinberg E
    N Y State Dent J; 1997; 63(6):30-2. PubMed ID: 9333728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Peer review: is one-eye king?].
    de Jong BC; Overbeke AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Jan; 137(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 8419837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Our editing work and analysis of peer review in 1994-98].
    Loría A; Lisker R
    Rev Invest Clin; 2000; 52(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 10818811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The importance of peer review.
    O'Keefe JP
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1999 Jan; 65(1):7. PubMed ID: 10232915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Peer review: an experiment.
    Harnad S
    Science; 1980 May; 208(4447):974, 976. PubMed ID: 7375919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.