103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12888993)
21. Combination of porous hydroxyapatite and cationic liposomes as a vector for BMP-2 gene therapy.
Ono I; Yamashita T; Jin HY; Ito Y; Hamada H; Akasaka Y; Nakasu M; Ogawa T; Jimbow K
Biomaterials; 2004 Aug; 25(19):4709-18. PubMed ID: 15120517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Potentiation of the activity of bone morphogenetic protein-2 in bone regeneration by a PLA-PEG/hydroxyapatite composite.
Kaito T; Myoui A; Takaoka K; Saito N; Nishikawa M; Tamai N; Ohgushi H; Yoshikawa H
Biomaterials; 2005 Jan; 26(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 15193882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A 12 month in vivo study on the response of bone to a hydroxyapatite-polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasty composite.
Itokawa H; Hiraide T; Moriya M; Fujimoto M; Nagashima G; Suzuki R; Fujimoto T
Biomaterials; 2007 Nov; 28(33):4922-7. PubMed ID: 17707904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. In vivo evaluation of hydroxyapatite foams.
Sepulveda P; Bressiani AH; Bressiani JC; Meseguer L; König B
J Biomed Mater Res; 2002 Dec; 62(4):587-92. PubMed ID: 12221707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of a cell adhesion molecule coating on the blasted surface of titanium implants on bone healing in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Lee SG; Choi BJ; Suh JY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):533-41. PubMed ID: 17929513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Hybrid bone implants: self-assembly of peptide amphiphile nanofibers within porous titanium.
Sargeant TD; Guler MO; Oppenheimer SM; Mata A; Satcher RL; Dunand DC; Stupp SI
Biomaterials; 2008 Jan; 29(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 17936353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic evaluation of interfacial bone healing around 3 different dental implants before and after radiation therapy.
Weinlaender M; Beumer J; Kenney EB; Lekovic V; Holmes R; Moy PK; Plenk H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 16634491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Performance of hydroxyapatite bone repair scaffolds created via three-dimensional fabrication techniques.
Dutta Roy T; Simon JL; Ricci JL; Rekow ED; Thompson VP; Parsons JR
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2003 Dec; 67(4):1228-37. PubMed ID: 14624509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Histological evaluation of the early bone response to hydroxyapatite (HA) implanted in rabbit tibia.
Khadijah K; Mashita M; Saidu MF; Fazilah F; Khalid KA
Med J Malaysia; 2004 May; 59 Suppl B():123-4. PubMed ID: 15468849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Bone formation on the apatite-coated zirconia porous scaffolds within a rabbit calvarial defect.
Kim HW; Shin SY; Kim HE; Lee YM; Chung CP; Lee HH; Rhyu IC
J Biomater Appl; 2008 May; 22(6):485-504. PubMed ID: 17494967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on the osteointegration of hydroxyapatite implants in cancellous bone: a morphologic and microstructural in vivo study.
Fini M; Cadossi R; Canè V; Cavani F; Giavaresi G; Krajewski A; Martini L; Aldini NN; Ravaglioli A; Rimondini L; Torricelli P; Giardino R
J Orthop Res; 2002 Jul; 20(4):756-63. PubMed ID: 12168664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bone formation using novel interconnected porous calcium hydroxyapatite ceramic hybridized with cultured marrow stromal stem cells derived from Green rat.
Ito Y; Tanaka N; Fujimoto Y; Yasunaga Y; Ishida O; Agung M; Ochi M
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Jun; 69(3):454-61. PubMed ID: 15127392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mineral apposition rates provide significant information on long-term effects in BMP-induced bone regeneration.
Schopper C; Moser D; Spassova-Tzekova E; Russmueller G; Goriwoda W; Lagogiannis G; Ewers R; Redl H
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Jun; 89(3):679-86. PubMed ID: 18442117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Experimental study of the effect of new bone formation on new type artificial bone composed of bioactive ceramics].
Zhu M; Zeng Y; Sun T; Peng Q
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Mar; 19(3):174-7. PubMed ID: 15828468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Nonceramic hydroxyapatite bone derivative in sinus augmentation procedures: clinical and histomorphometric observations in 10 consecutive cases.
Artzi Z; Nemcovsky CE; Dayan D
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Aug; 23(4):381-9. PubMed ID: 12956482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A feasibility study evaluating an in situ formed synthetic biodegradable membrane for guided bone regeneration in dogs.
Jung RE; Lecloux G; Rompen E; Ramel CF; Buser D; Hammerle CH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 19191792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The bone response of oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive titanium implants.
Sul YT; Johansson C; Byon E; Albrektsson T
Biomaterials; 2005 Nov; 26(33):6720-30. PubMed ID: 15975649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Experimental study of the biocompatible and osteoinductive behavior of the hydroxyapatite/ultra-high molecular weight polyethtlene composite].
Li DM; Zhang SZ; Chen T; Zhang Y; Song WX; Min Y; Qin Y
Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 May; 20(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 15449615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Correlations between the in vitro and in vivo bioactivity of the Ti/HA composites fabricated by a powder metallurgy method.
Ning C; Zhou Y
Acta Biomater; 2008 Nov; 4(6):1944-52. PubMed ID: 18502711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative study between dense and porous hydroxyapatite using light and scanning electron microscopy.
Pohchi A; Suzina AH; Samsudin AR; Al-Salihi KA
Med J Malaysia; 2004 May; 59 Suppl B():151-2. PubMed ID: 15468863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
