BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1289260)

  • 1. The influence of occlusal surface material on peak masticatory forces using osseointegrated implant-supported prostheses.
    Hobkirk JA; Psarros KJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 1289260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On occlusal forces in dentitions with implant-supported fixed cantilever prostheses.
    Falk H
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1990; 69():1-40. PubMed ID: 2196708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional force measurements on mandibular implants supporting overdentures.
    Mericske-Stern R; Geering AH; Burgin WB; Graf H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 1398835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vivo registration of force development with ceramic and acrylic resin occlusal materials on implant-supported prostheses.
    Bassit R; Lindström H; Rangert B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 11858570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Functional loads on freestanding and connected implants in three-unit mandibular prostheses opposing complete dentures: an in vivo study.
    Gunne J; Rangert B; Glantz PO; Svensson A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(3):335-41. PubMed ID: 9197098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The incomprehensible success of the implant stabilised overdenture in the edentulous mandible: a literature review on transfer of chewing forces to bone surrounding implants.
    Chao YL; Meijer HJ; Van Oort RP; Versteegh PA
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1995 Dec; 3(6):255-61. PubMed ID: 8603169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrospective evaluation of complete-arch fixed partial dentures connecting teeth and implant abutments in patients with normal and reduced periodontal support.
    Cordaro L; Ercoli C; Rossini C; Torsello F; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 16198167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in masticatory function in patients with endodontically treated teeth and single-implant-supported prostheses: a pilot study.
    Woodmansey KF; Ayik M; Buschang PH; White CA; He J
    J Endod; 2009 Jan; 35(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 19084116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Control of jaw closing forces: a comparison between natural tooth and osseointegrated implant.
    Leung T; Lai VF
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2000 Sep; 8(3):113-6. PubMed ID: 11307564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electromyographic analysis of masticatory and neck muscles in subjects with natural dentition, teeth-supported and implant-supported prostheses.
    Tartaglia GM; Testori T; Pallavera A; Marelli B; Sforza C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1081-8. PubMed ID: 18828826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of a masticatory robot to analyze the shock absorption capacity of different restorative materials for prosthetic implants: a preliminary report.
    Conserva E; Menini M; Tealdo T; Bevilacqua M; Ravera G; Pera F; Pera P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 19260428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrospective analysis of porcelain failures of metal ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by 729 implants in 152 patients: patient-specific and implant-specific predictors of ceramic failure.
    Kinsel RP; Lin D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):388-94. PubMed ID: 19463666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of osseointegrated implants on the coordination of masticatory muscles: a pilot study.
    Gartner JL; Mushimoto K; Weber HP; Nishimura I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Aug; 84(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 10946336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nonlinear finite element analysis of a splinted implant with various connectors and occlusal forces.
    Lin CL; Wang JC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 12814307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ten-year longitudinal study of masticatory function in edentulous patients treated with fixed complete dentures on osseointegrated implants.
    Carlsson GE; Lindquist LW
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(5):448-53. PubMed ID: 7802913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stress distribution on the metal framework of the implant-supported fixed prosthesis using different veneering materials.
    Ciftçi Y; Canay S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):406-11. PubMed ID: 12066633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of superstructure materials on strain around an implant under 2 loading conditions: a technical investigation.
    Stegaroiu R; Khraisat A; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):735-42. PubMed ID: 15508991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finite element analysis study of the effect of superstructure material on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis.
    Sertgöz A
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 9484066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vivo forces on implants influenced by occlusal scheme and food consistency.
    Morneburg TR; Pröschel PA
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):481-6. PubMed ID: 14651231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.