These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12893197)

  • 1. Continuous abdominal fascial closure: a randomized controlled trial of poly(L-lactide/glycolide).
    Orr JW; Montz FJ; Barter J; Schaitzberg SD; Delmore JE; Dodson MK; Gallup D; Yeh KA; Elias EG
    Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Aug; 90(2):342-7. PubMed ID: 12893197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective single-arm clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of monofilament polydioxanone barbed suture, MONOFIX
    Pyo DH; Yun SH; Lee WY
    World J Surg; 2024 Jul; 48(7):1674-1680. PubMed ID: 38877993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incisional hernia after abdominal closure with slowly absorbable versus fast absorbable, antibacterial-coated sutures.
    Justinger C; Slotta JE; Schilling MK
    Surgery; 2012 Mar; 151(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 22088813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monofilament versus multifilament absorbable sutures for abdominal closure.
    Sahlin S; Ahlberg J; Granström L; Ljungström KG
    Br J Surg; 1993 Mar; 80(3):322-4. PubMed ID: 8472140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Continuous absorbable vs interrupted nonabsorbable fascial closure. A prospective, randomized comparison.
    McNeil PM; Sugerman HJ
    Arch Surg; 1986 Jul; 121(7):821-3. PubMed ID: 3013123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Closure of elective abdominal incisions with monofilament, non-absorbable suture material versus polyfilament absorbable suture material.
    Talpur AA; Awan MS; Surhio AR
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2011; 23(2):51-4. PubMed ID: 24800342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of suture technique on the occurrence of incisional hernia after elective midline abdominal wall closure: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Fortelny RH; Baumann P; Thasler WE; Albertsmeier M; Riedl S; Steurer W; Kewer JL; Shamiyeh A
    Trials; 2015 Feb; 16():52. PubMed ID: 25887884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized comparison of polyglycolic acid and polyglyconate sutures for abdominal fascial closure after laparotomy in patients with suspected impaired wound healing.
    Osther PJ; Gjøde P; Mortensen BB; Mortensen PB; Bartholin J; Gottrup F
    Br J Surg; 1995 Aug; 82(8):1080-2. PubMed ID: 7648158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Layer closure of laparotomy wounds with absorbable and non-absorbable suture materials.
    Irvin TT; Koffman CG; Duthie HL
    Br J Surg; 1976 Oct; 63(10):793-6. PubMed ID: 791437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Polyglyconate or polyglycolic acid suture in patients with suspected impaired wound healing].
    Osther PJ; Gjøde P; Mortensen BB; Mortensen PB; Andersen JB; Gottrup F
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1997 Feb; 159(8):1100-3. PubMed ID: 9072856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures - design of a multi-centre randomised trial to evaluate abdominal closure techniques INSECT-trial [ISRCTN24023541].
    Knaebel HP; Koch M; Sauerland S; Diener MK; Büchler MW; Seiler CM;
    BMC Surg; 2005 Mar; 5():3. PubMed ID: 15755324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions.
    Muysoms FE; Antoniou SA; Bury K; Campanelli G; Conze J; Cuccurullo D; de Beaux AC; Deerenberg EB; East B; Fortelny RH; Gillion JF; Henriksen NA; Israelsson L; Jairam A; Jänes A; Jeekel J; López-Cano M; Miserez M; Morales-Conde S; Sanders DL; Simons MP; Śmietański M; Venclauskas L; Berrevoet F;
    Hernia; 2015 Feb; 19(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 25618025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Meta-analysis of suture techniques for midline abdominal incisions].
    Jin JB; Jiang ZP; Chen S
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Aug; 48(16):1256-61. PubMed ID: 21055218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Syneture stainless STEEL suture. A collective review of its performance in surgical wound closure.
    Edlich RF; Drake DB; Rodeheaver GT; Winters KL; Greene JA; Gubler KD; Long WB; Britt LD; Winters SP; Scott CC; Lin KY
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2006; 16(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 16566749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of Surgical Expertise on Biomechanical Properties of Sutures After Abdominal Wall Closure.
    Diaz-Elizondo JA; Guraieb-Trueba M; Baca-Arzaga A; Vazquez-Armendariz J; Segura-Ibarra V; Rodriguez CA; Flores-Villalba E
    J Surg Res; 2020 Jan; 245():403-409. PubMed ID: 31430716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Synthetic polyglycomer short-term absorbable sutures vs. polydioxanone long-term absorbable sutures for preventing incisional hernia and wound dehiscence after abdominal wall closure: a comparative randomized study of patients treated for gastric or colon cancer.
    Ohira G; Kawahira H; Miyauchi H; Suzuki K; Nishimori T; Hanari N; Mori M; Tohma T; Gunji H; Horibe D; Narushima K; Matsubara H
    Surg Today; 2015 Jul; 45(7):841-5. PubMed ID: 25556881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomised prospective study of abdominal wall closure in patients with gynaecological cancer.
    Berretta R; Rolla M; Patrelli TS; Piantelli G; Merisio C; Melpignano M; Nardelli GB; Modena AB
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Aug; 50(4):391-6. PubMed ID: 20716270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraoperative handling and wound healing: controlled clinical trial comparing coated VICRYL plus antibacterial suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with triclosan) with coated VICRYL suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture).
    Ford HR; Jones P; Gaines B; Reblock K; Simpkins DL
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2005; 6(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 16201941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Current standards of abdominal wall closure techniques : Conventional suture techniques].
    Heger P; Pianka F; Diener MK; Mihaljevic AL
    Chirurg; 2016 Sep; 87(9):737-743. PubMed ID: 27392763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abdominal wound closure. A randomized prospective study of 571 patients comparing continuous vs. interrupted suture techniques.
    Richards PC; Balch CM; Aldrete JS
    Ann Surg; 1983 Feb; 197(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 6297417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.