153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12893900)
1. Irreversible JPEG compression of digital chest radiographs for primary interpretation: assessment of visually lossless threshold.
Slone RM; Muka E; Pilgram TK
Radiology; 2003 Aug; 228(2):425-9. PubMed ID: 12893900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of visually lossless irreversible image compression: comparison of three methods by using an image-comparison workstation.
Slone RM; Foos DH; Whiting BR; Muka E; Rubin DA; Pilgram TK; Kohm KS; Young SS; Ho P; Hendrickson DD
Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):543-53. PubMed ID: 10796938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG 2000-compressed chest CT images using mathematical and perceptual quality metrics.
Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Hahn S; Kim TJ; Kim YH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):328-34. PubMed ID: 18212217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Regional variance of visually lossless threshold in compressed chest CT images: lung versus mediastinum and chest wall.
Kim TJ; Lee KH; Kim B; Kim KJ; Chun EJ; Bajpai V; Kim YH; Hahn S; Lee KW
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 69(3):483-8. PubMed ID: 18194845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Irreversible JPEG 2000 compression of abdominal CT for primary interpretation: assessment of visually lossless threshold.
Lee KH; Kim YH; Kim BH; Kim KJ; Kim TJ; Kim HJ; Hahn S
Eur Radiol; 2007 Jun; 17(6):1529-34. PubMed ID: 17119972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic usefulness of chest computed radiography--film versus cathode-ray tube images.
Ishigaki T; Sakuma S; Endo T; Ikeda M
J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):25-30. PubMed ID: 7734536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. JPEG2000 3D compression vs. 2D compression: an assessment of artifact amount and computing time in compressing thin-section abdomen CT images.
Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Richter T; Kang HS; Kim SY; Kim YH; Seo J
Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):835-44. PubMed ID: 19378744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. JPEG 2000 compression of abdominal CT: difference in tolerance between thin- and thick-section images.
Woo HS; Kim KJ; Kim TJ; Hahn S; Kim B; Kim YH; Lee KH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):535-41. PubMed ID: 17715097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Artifacts in slab average-intensity-projection images reformatted from JPEG 2000 compressed thin-section abdominal CT data sets.
Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Kim HR; Kim YH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):W342-50. PubMed ID: 18492876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences in compression artifacts on thin- and thick-section lung CT images.
Bajpai V; Lee KH; Kim B; Kim KJ; Kim TJ; Kim YH; Kang HS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Aug; 191(2):W38-43. PubMed ID: 18647884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Image compression and chest radiograph interpretation: image perception comparison between uncompressed chest radiographs and chest radiographs stored using 10:1 JPEG compression.
Beall DP; Shelton PD; Kinsey TV; Horton MC; Fortman BJ; Achenbach S; Smirnoff V; Courneya DL; Carpenter B; Gironda JT
J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):33-8. PubMed ID: 10847358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of CRT monitor display for personal computer in the detection of small lung nodules: with particular emphasis on comparison between JPEG and wavelet compression].
Kihara Y
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 Apr; 61(5):231-7. PubMed ID: 11398347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lossy three-dimensional JPEG2000 compression of abdominal CT images: assessment of the visually lossless threshold and effect of compression ratio on image quality.
Ringl H; Schernthaner RE; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Weber M; Schaefer-Prokop C; Herold CJ; Schima W
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):467-74. PubMed ID: 17890355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acceptable compression ratio of full-field digital mammography using JPEG 2000.
Kang BJ; Kim HS; Park CS; Choi JJ; Lee JH; Choi BG
Clin Radiol; 2011 Jul; 66(7):609-13. PubMed ID: 21450282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interaction between noise and file compression and its effect on the recognition of caries in digital imaging.
Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10654032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of subtle abnormalities on chest radiographs after irreversible compression.
Savcenko V; Erickson BJ; Palisson PM; Persons KR; Manduca A; Hartman TE; Harms GF; Brown LR
Radiology; 1998 Mar; 206(3):609-16. PubMed ID: 9494474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceived fidelity of compressed and reconstructed radiological images: a preliminary exploration of compression, luminance, and viewing distance.
Pilgram TK; Slone RM; Muka E; Cox JR; Blaine GJ
J Digit Imaging; 1998 Nov; 11(4):168-75. PubMed ID: 9848049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of irreversible JPEG compression for a clinical ultrasound practice.
Persons KR; Hangiandreou NJ; Charboneau NT; Charboneau J; James E; Douglas BR; Salmon AP; Knudsen JM; Erickson BJ
J Digit Imaging; 2002 Mar; 15(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 12134210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Regional difference in compression artifacts in low-dose chest CT images: effects of mathematical and perceptual factors.
Kim KJ; Kim B; Lee KH; Kim TJ; Mantiuk R; Kang HS; Kim YH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Aug; 191(2):W30-7. PubMed ID: 18647883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of two compression algorithms and the detection of caries.
Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; Sanderink GC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 12087443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
