These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1289434)
1. The evaluation of self-report instruments for use in research. Dilorio C J Neurosci Nurs; 1992 Dec; 24(6):350-3. PubMed ID: 1289434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Importance of Reporting Psychometric Properties of Instruments Used in Nursing Research. Zangaro GA West J Nurs Res; 2019 Nov; 41(11):1548-1550. PubMed ID: 31342881 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Grant JS; Davis LL Res Nurs Health; 1997 Jun; 20(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 9179180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Instrument construction: Part II. Lederman RP; Worsham S MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1994; 19(5):291. PubMed ID: 7990677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Using existing measurement instruments. Strickland OL J Nurs Meas; 1994; 2(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 7882090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. BARRIERS: the barriers to research utilization scale. Funk SG; Champagne MT; Wiese RA; Tornquist EM Appl Nurs Res; 1991 Feb; 4(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 1741634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. How to try this: define your terms. Evaluating instruments for use in nursing practice. Stotts NA; Aldrich KM Am J Nurs; 2007 Oct; 107(10):71-2. PubMed ID: 17895736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychometric examination of instruments using aggregated data. Verran JA; Mark BA; Lamb G Res Nurs Health; 1992 Jun; 15(3):237-40. PubMed ID: 1509115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The proliferation of unreliable and invalid questionnaires. Rempusheski VF Appl Nurs Res; 1990 Nov; 3(4):174-6. PubMed ID: 2252407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Translating instruments into other languages: basic considerations. Duffy ME Clin Nurse Spec; 2006; 20(5):225-6. PubMed ID: 16980789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Finding and evaluating potential research instruments. Koop PM Can Oncol Nurs J; 2003; 13(4):207-8. PubMed ID: 14692363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A psychometric evaluation of a visual analogue scale of craving for cigarettes. Wewers ME; Rachfal C; Ahijevych K West J Nurs Res; 1990 Oct; 12(5):672-81. PubMed ID: 2238644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Instruments for quantitative methods of nursing research]. Vellone E Prof Inferm; 2000; 53(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 11228871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Focus on psychometrics. Internal consistency estimates of reliability. Ferketich S Res Nurs Health; 1990 Dec; 13(6):437-40. PubMed ID: 2270309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reading research critically: assessing the validity and reliability of research instrumentation--Part 1. Giuffre M J Post Anesth Nurs; 1995 Feb; 10(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 7707251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Straying in the methodology. II. Bias introduced by questionnaires]. Pouwer F; van der Ploeg HM; Bramsen I Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Jul; 142(27):1556-8. PubMed ID: 9763830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Designing questionnaires for midwifery research. Douglas F; van Teijlingen E; Brindle S; Hundley V; Bruce J; Torrance N RCM Midwives; 2005 May; 8(5):212-5. PubMed ID: 15960327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. An instrument's conceptual base: its link to theory. Strickland OL J Nurs Meas; 2001; 9(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 11469140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]