These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1289467)
21. [ECG interpretation by computer. How reliable is rhythm diagnosis?]. Rosendahl L; Pahlm O Lakartidningen; 1994 May; 91(21):2140-2. PubMed ID: 8052000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Support vector machine-based expert system for reliable heartbeat recognition. Osowski S; Hoai LT; Markiewicz T IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Apr; 51(4):582-9. PubMed ID: 15072212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Maximizing sensitivity in medical diagnosis using biased minimax probability machine. Huang K; Yang H; King I; Lyu MR IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 May; 53(5):821-31. PubMed ID: 16686404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Canadian Colloquium on Computer-Assisted Interpretation of Electrocardiograms. II. Some considerations relevant to the selection of ECG Program. Milliken JA Can Med Assoc J; 1973 May; 108(10):1232-8. PubMed ID: 4574246 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Use of diagnostic decision support systems in medical education. Berner ES; McGowan JJ Methods Inf Med; 2010; 49(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 20405092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A decision support system and rule-based algorithm to augment the human interpretation of the 12-lead electrocardiogram. Cairns AW; Bond RR; Finlay DD; Guldenring D; Badilini F; Libretti G; Peace AJ; Leslie SJ J Electrocardiol; 2017; 50(6):781-786. PubMed ID: 28903861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of the normal values for signal-averaged electrocardiogram. Marcus FI; Zareba W; Sherrill D J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2007 Feb; 18(2):231-3. PubMed ID: 17338774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. An empirical comparison of expert-derived and data-derived classification trees. Chiogna M; Spiegelhalter DJ; Franklin RC; Bull K Stat Med; 1996 Jan; 15(2):157-69. PubMed ID: 8614752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Medical informatics and pediatrics. Decision-support systems. Johnson KB; Feldman MJ Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 1995 Dec; 149(12):1371-80. PubMed ID: 7489077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Context-sensitive autoassociative memories as expert systems in medical diagnosis. Pomi A; Olivera F BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2006 Nov; 6():39. PubMed ID: 17121675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Modelling of classification rules on metabolic patterns including machine learning and expert knowledge. Baumgartner C; Böhm C; Baumgartner D J Biomed Inform; 2005 Apr; 38(2):89-98. PubMed ID: 15796999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accuracy of electrocardiogram interpretation by cardiologists in the setting of incorrect computer analysis. Anh D; Krishnan S; Bogun F J Electrocardiol; 2006 Jul; 39(3):343-5. PubMed ID: 16777525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accurate Classification of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps Using Computer-Aided Analysis. Chen PJ; Lin MC; Lai MJ; Lin JC; Lu HH; Tseng VS Gastroenterology; 2018 Feb; 154(3):568-575. PubMed ID: 29042219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Computer-aided decision-making for epilepsy and sleep diagnostics. Korpinen L Acta Neurol Scand Suppl; 1993; 144():1-101. PubMed ID: 8322574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The computer and clinical decision-support systems in primary care. Taylor TR J Fam Pract; 1990 Feb; 30(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 2405092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Diagnostic reasoning and medical decision-making with fuzzy influence diagrams. Kao HY Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Apr; 90(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 18192070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Use of electrocardiogram indices of myocardial ischemia for risk stratification and decision making of reperfusion strategies. Dianati Maleki N; Ehteshami Afshar A; Armstrong PW J Electrocardiol; 2014; 47(4):520-4. PubMed ID: 24853084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Can the lessons learned from the assessment of automated electrocardiogram analysis in the Common Standards for quantitative Electrocardiography study benefit measurement of delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images? Fayn J; Rubel P; Macfarlane PW J Electrocardiol; 2007 Jul; 40(3):246-50. PubMed ID: 17478178 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Diagnostic and prognostic decision support systems. Bartels PH; Thompson D; Weber JE Pathologica; 1995 Jun; 87(3):221-36. PubMed ID: 8570283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Common standards for quantitative electrocardiography: goals and main results. CSE Working Party. Willems JL; Arnaud P; van Bemmel JH; Degani R; Macfarlane PW; Zywietz C Methods Inf Med; 1990 Sep; 29(4):263-71. PubMed ID: 2233372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]