These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12894697)

  • 1. The link between the peel force of adhesive dressings and subjective discomfort in volunteer subjects.
    Dykes PJ; Heggie R
    J Wound Care; 2003 Jul; 12(7):260-2. PubMed ID: 12894697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of adhesive dressings on the stratum corneum of the skin.
    Dykes PJ; Heggie R; Hill SA
    J Wound Care; 2001 Feb; 10(2):7-10. PubMed ID: 12964220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of adhesive dressing edges on cutaneous irritancy and skin barrier function.
    Dykes PJ
    J Wound Care; 2007 Mar; 16(3):97-100. PubMed ID: 17385583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of the skin stripping of wound dressing adhesives.
    Waring M; Bielfeldt S; Mätzold K; Wilhelm KP; Butcher M
    J Wound Care; 2011 Sep; 20(9):412, 414, 416-22. PubMed ID: 22068140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preliminary studies on the relationship among peel force, quantitative measures of skin damage and subjective discomfort.
    Murahata RI; Taylor MG; Damia J; Grove GL
    Skin Res Technol; 2008 Nov; 14(4):478-83. PubMed ID: 18937785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigating the pressure-reducing effect of wound dressings.
    Matsuzaki K; Kishi K
    J Wound Care; 2015 Nov; 24(11):512, 514-7. PubMed ID: 26551643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Allevyn Adhesive and Biatain Adhesive in the management of pressure ulcers.
    Amione P; Ricci E; Topo F; Izzo L; Pirovano R; Rega V; Cocci C; Masina M
    J Wound Care; 2005 Sep; 14(8):365-70. PubMed ID: 16178291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of wound dressings with soft silicone adhesive technology.
    Morris C; Emsley P; Marland E; Meuleneire F; White R
    Paediatr Nurs; 2009 Apr; 21(3):38-43. PubMed ID: 19397129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigation of adhesion of modern wound dressings: a comparative analysis of 56 different wound dressings.
    Klode J; Schöttler L; Stoffels I; Körber A; Schadendorf D; Dissemond J
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2011 Aug; 25(8):933-9. PubMed ID: 21062365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adhesives for medical application - Peel strength testing and evaluation of biophysical skin response.
    Mbithi F; Worsley PR
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Dec; 148():106168. PubMed ID: 37847959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison among several foam dressings in the properties of water-absorption, water-locking and air permeability].
    Ge TC; Xing N; Chen J; Zhou JJ; Su GL; Shi JW; Zheng YS
    Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 28(5):349-52. PubMed ID: 23290760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Skin changes induced by a zinc oxide dressing compared with a hydrocolloid dressing in healthy individuals.
    Nielsen LF; Blume N; Romme T; Samuelsen P; Everland H; Ifversen P; Karlsmark T
    Skin Res Technol; 2005 May; 11(2):140-51. PubMed ID: 15807813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence review: the clinical benefits of Safetac technology in wound care.
    Davies P; Rippon M
    J Wound Care; 2008 Nov; Suppl():3-31. PubMed ID: 19252457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laser-Doppler imaging assessment of skin hyperemia as an indicator of trauma after adhesive strip removal.
    Mayrovitz HN; Carta SG
    Adv Wound Care; 1996; 9(4):38-42. PubMed ID: 9069741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biophysical effects of repetitive removal of adhesive dressings on peri-ulcer skin.
    Zillmer R; Agren MS; Gottrup F; Karlsmark T
    J Wound Care; 2006 May; 15(5):187-91. PubMed ID: 16711170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation study of the properties of two adhesive foam dressings.
    Viamontes L; Jones AM
    Br J Nurs; 2003 Jun; 12(11 Suppl):S43-4, S46-9. PubMed ID: 12829978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transparent film dressing vs pressure dressing after percutaneous transluminal coronary angiography.
    McIe S; Petitte T; Pride L; Leeper D; Ostrow CL
    Am J Crit Care; 2009 Jan; 18(1):14-9; quiz 20. PubMed ID: 19116400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Experimental in vitro evaluation of the absorption capacity and control of exudate of 3 wound healing dressings].
    Torra i Bou JE; Cortés i Borra A; Manresa i Domínguez JM
    Rev Enferm; 1998 Oct; 21(242):suppl 2-8. PubMed ID: 10030154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experiments on peeling adhesive tapes from human forearms.
    Karwoski AC; Plaut RH
    Skin Res Technol; 2004 Nov; 10(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 15536659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Reducing the pressure on heel and foot-sole areas by means of Allevyn Gentle, Gentle Border and Gentle Border Heel dressings].
    Barberà i Guillem R; Gómez Sendra F; Bermejo Bosch I; Garcés Pérez L
    Rev Enferm; 2010 Mar; 33(3):51-6. PubMed ID: 20429209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.